Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here UFOs | Paranormal | Area 51 People | Places | Random Top 100 | What's New Catalog | New Books Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Our Bookstore is OPEN Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1999 -> Jul -> Here

From: Jim Mortellaro <Jsmortell@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 1999 15:29:05 EDT
Fwd Date: Thu, 22 Jul 1999 17:10:52 -0400
Subject: Re: Sheffield UFO Incident 2?


 >From: Roy Hale <roy.hale@virgin.net>
 >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
 >Subject: Re: Sheffield UFO Incident 2?
 >Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 01:23:09 +0100

 >>>>From: Jenny Randles <nufon@currantbun.com>
 >>>>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>,
 >>>>Subject: Re: Sheffield UFO Incident 2?
 >>>>Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 12:52:48 +0100

 >>To me ufology is not a matter of belief. It is a matter of fact
 >>and evidence.>

 >Hi Again JR,

 >So in the last 25yrs of UFO research carried out by yourself and
 >after having given extensive lectures, and many books and
 >articles you still say that you have not seen enough evidence to
 >state whether or not that in your own mind ETs have visited this
 >planet at least once?

 >So where does that leave us if people in the field of UFO
 >research can research the subject for 25yrs and come out with no
 >conclusive result of Alien contact?

 >Did Allen. J. Hynek have a huge change of heart on the UFO
 >research that he was presented with whilst involved with Blue
 >Book? Did he not state later his resolve that some of the UFO's
 >seen in our skies were of Alien origin?

 >You see, I ask this question of a lot of people who have
 >researched this for years, some are more forthcoming and will
 >tell me a straight Y/N. This is after years of studying the UFO
 >enigma, I just think it's about time those researchers who have
 >been in the field long enough, should now be telling us what
 >their conclusions are. Is ET coming here Y/N  or do we have to
 >wait another 25yrs for an answer?

 >And if you are presented with hard evidence of ET don't you then
 >have to believe it or not?


Dear Roy,

You are quite correct.  No one whose opinion is valued, has ever
come to the conclusion that ET's have visited, nor has anyone
of the opposing opinion and whose opinion is valued, come to
the conclusion that ET has not visited.

Which leaves those whose opinions take the opposite leaning,
meaning, (wow, that rhymes!) that the opinions of those who
have stated that ET has visited and those who have stated that
ET had not visited, are all not valued.  Not only that, but there
are so many people who have investigated these phenomena,
this phenomenon, these pheramones, have waffled on their
conclusions too.....

Uh, have I got that right?

Well, let me end these arguments right here and now!

First, I have not been a researcher for very long.  Therefore, I
do not fit your profile in that way.  Right?  Okey dokey...
then, addictively, uh, I mean additive-ly,  I am not waffling. I
hate waffels.  I prefer flap jacks.  Underdone.  I like that
heavey feeling.  Sops up a lotta grape juice, eh?

So, here it comes, over the teeth and through the gums...
ET's may be here.  It depends.  ET's may not be here, altho
they may have been here.  It is possible that they are here, but
have not been here before.  That could be.

Then there is the theory that a wet bird never flies at night.

We concur with all of the above.

Probably.

I am competely and irrevocably concvinced!  Most likely.