Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here UFOs | Paranormal | Area 51 People | Places | Random Top 100 | What's New Catalog | New Books Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Our Bookstore is OPEN Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1999 -> Jul -> Here

From: Bruce Maccabee <brumac@compuserve.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 1999 23:16:30 -0400
Fwd Date: Sun, 25 Jul 1999 09:41:32 -0400
Subject: Re: Kenneth Arnold's 'Flying Discs'


 >Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 00:09:04 -0300
 >From: Donald Ledger <dledger@ns.sympatico.ca>
 >To: updates@globalserve.net
 >Subject: Re: Kenneth Arnold's 'Flying Discs'

<snip>

 >>Perhaps Arnold's bat-like 'UFOs' truly were nine alien
 >>spacecraft, performing death defying stunts by weaving in and
 >>out of mountain tops and canyons at 1,500 miles per hour.>

 >>For reasons best known to themselves.

 >>Alternatively, having looked at the full picture of Arnold's
 >>various reports, inconsistencies and proclivity to make some
 >>claims which at times bordered on the absurd, I'm satisfied that
 >>overall there's sufficient evidence why a formation of White
 >>Pelicans is demonstrably the 'best fit' by a long way for
 >>Arnold's nine, perplexing, 'flying discs'.>

 >It fits alright James like a size ten foot fits into a size six
 >shoe.

 >For those of you not aware, James has been toting this nonsense
 >around on other lists as well, but so far there does not appear
 >to be any takers.

Gee, I wonder why? It seems so _logical_!