Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1999 -> Jul -> Re: Sheffield UFO Incident 2?

UFO UpDates Mailing List

From: Andy Roberts <Brigantia@compuserve.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1999 12:48:29 -0400
Fwd Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1999 20:37:06 -0400
Subject: Re: Sheffield UFO Incident 2?


 >From: Stan Friedman <fsphys@brunnet.net>
 >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
 >Subject: Re: Sheffield UFO Incident 2?
 >Date: Sat, 24 Jul 1999 11:57:04 -0300


<snip>

 >We do the best we can. Every criminal court
 >judge in non jury trials listens to prosecution and defense
 >lawyers and witnesses and decides. Rarely is physical proof
 >available.

Stanton's wiggly reasons to justify his belief (because that's
all it is) in extraterrestrials visiting Earth reach new levels.

Yes Stanton, criminal courts don't always have physical proof.
Well spotted. But there is one teensy flaw in your argument
here. Criminal courts are dealing with flesh and blood human
beings (dead or alive), whose physical existance is without
doubt. ET believers have no such physical proof. None,
whatsoever. Hence you analogy is useless. It doesn't matter what
you believe, what the statistics of belief show. All that
matters in the ET debate is hard, physical proof. And there
ain't any.

Happy Trails

Andy

'You may have observed when you walk into a wall you
get a certain sensation of reality.'
Robin Williamson
1969