Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here UFOs | Paranormal | Area 51 People | Places | Random Top 100 | What's New Catalog | New Books Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Our Bookstore is OPEN Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1999 -> Jul -> Here

From: Jenny Randles <nufon@currantbun.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 17:08:50 +0100
Fwd Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 15:25:05 -0400
Subject: Re: Sheffield UFO Incident 2?


 >From: Jim Mortellaro <Jsmortell@aol.com>
 >Date: Sun, 25 Jul 1999 21:53:12 EDT
 >Subject: Re: Sheffield UFO Incident 2?
 >To: updates@globalserve.net

 >>From: Jenny Randles <nufon@currantbun.com>
 >>To: <updates@globalserve.net>
 >>Subject: Re: Sheffield UFO Incident 2?
 >>Date: Sun, 25 Jul 1999 11:56:28 +0100

 >>>Date: Thu, 22 Jul 1999 22:14:34 +0000
 >>>From: dave bowden <dave.bowden@cableinet.co.uk>
 >>>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
 >>>Subject: Re: Sheffield UFO Incident 2?

 >>>>From: Stan Friedman <fsphys@brunnet.net>
 >>>>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
 >>>>Subject: Re: Sheffield UFO Incident 2?
 >>>>Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 23:18:02 -0300

 >>Good points. But I did answer this specific question - twice -
 >>in detail. Check back through updates last week. The statistics
 >>argument grew from that.

 >>But I would also like to see others add their responses to this
 >>question. Heres a stat for you. I bet there will be a far higher
 >>number of US replies saying 'yes' and a far lower percentage of
 >>UK/European responses that say no spacecraft has provably (or
 >>probably) landed in their estimation.

 >Dear Ms Randles et Al....

 >Very curious as to your reason for this "stat?" Personally I am
 >neither a proponent nor opponent of that view. I would frankly
 >doubt it, as both France and Russia, to name two countries,
 >appear to me to have a strong Ufological following and both
 >appear NOT to have the degree of skepticism seen in England and
 >the United States. But that's just a guess by someone who drinks
 >a great deal of vin ordinaire...

 >And is yous a "stat" or a "bet?"

 >That's my excuse, what is your reasoning?

Hi,

I am afraid I do not follow what it is that you want me to
explain that I have not done already during this discussion. I
have explained in considerable detail last week the basis of my
argument about the figures I find for IFOs, UAP and possible
alien UFOs. If I go through it all again we risk boring the
list, but if there was any specific point you did not grasp from
that series of answers, please elaborate and I will try to
elucidate.

Best wishes,

Jenny Randles