From: Jim Mortellaro <Jsmortell@aol.com> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 15:25:18 EDT Fwd Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 17:13:09 -0400 Subject: Re: Sheffield UFO Incident 2? >From: Sue Strickland <strick@H2Net.net> >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net> >Subject: Re: Sheffield UFO Incident 2? >Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 06:07:55 -0600 >>Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1999 12:48:29 -0400 >>From: Andy Roberts <Brigantia@compuserve.com> >>Subject: Re: Sheffield UFO Incident 2? >>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net> >Andy wrote (snip): >>...Criminal courts are dealing with flesh and blood human >>beings (dead or alive), whose physical existence is without >>doubt. ET believers have no such physical proof. None, >>whatsoever. >Wrong. Read again my July 4 and July 19 postings to UFO Updates. >(clip from July 19th)..."I have conscious recall of how I got >those burns...from an errant laser beam attached to a >transporter, in my bedroom in 1961 with many "visitors" present. >Do I expect you to believe that? No. You weren't there. >(clip from July 4th posting).."I can tell you, that in 1961, >there was no government experimenting on children in their >bedrooms with 3-dimensional laser-built transporters that could >move into the 4th dimension (through walls). We could barely get >into orbit as I recall. Is that enough "proof" for others? I >don't know. It certainly is for me. Pain is a great reality >check." >Your argument doesn't hold up with the thousands of people who >have experienced such incidents, and have the proof of the scars >to prove it. I'm sure I'm not the only one who has conscious >recall of how they were used and abused. >Start looking for similar people, people. >Sue Your name is Sue! How do you do? I am so sorry to be the first (or the hundredth) to tell you this, Sue, but what is in your memory or mine, matters not one dot to the person with the closed mind. He or she will assign some reason or other with which to demean the memory. Undigested beef, hallucination (you were probably on extra strength Excedrin or something) and blah, blah. The real answer from any skeptic should be, "I don't know what happened to you, however it is not in my paradigm to believe it was anything but something "natural" and merely misconstrued." Or whatever.... The real answer from any experiencer should be, "I don't know what happened to me, but I can tell you exactly what my mind and memory saw and what my body felt." Someone is gonna hafta convince me exactly what it was and _prove_ it before my mind attaches to anything but what it was to me and for me. It's the least we can expect. But rather than even this caveat, we get some very difference things, do we not? They tell us _exactly_ what it was we did NOT see. In another post, I stated that I would not wish this experience on anyone except my brother in law, this experience. I am begining to change my mind. I am now adding others to this list. Jim
UFO UpDates - Toronto -
updates@globalserve.net
Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp - ++ 416-696-0304
A Hand-Operated E-Mail Subscription Service for the Study of UFO Related
Phenomena.
To subscribe please send your first and last name to
updates@globalserve.net
Message submissions should be sent to the same address.
|
Link it to the appropriate Ufologist or UFO Topic page. |
Archived as a public service by Area 51 Research Center which is not
responsible for content.
Financial support for this web server is provided by the
Research Center Catalog.
Software by Glenn Campbell.
Technical contact:
webmaster@ufomind.com