Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here UFOs | Paranormal | Area 51 People | Places | Random Top 100 | What's New Catalog | New Books Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Our Bookstore is OPEN Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1999 -> Jul -> Here

From: Jerry Black <blackhole60@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 07:05:23 PDT
Fwd Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 13:19:47 -0400
Subject: Re: Jerry Black's Open Letter to Friedman


Mr. Joe Murgia:

I certainly disagree with your analysis that we have to prove
every one of Ed Walters' photographs to be a hoax. We have
proven conclusively through the work of Mr. William G. Hyzer
[and his son James] that photograph #19, the famous road-shot,
is without question, a double exposure.

Mr. William G. Hyzer was given 10-photographs. In his
preliminary report, he stated of the other nine photos, that
while not being able to conclusively prove that they were double
exposures, also showed signs of double exposure. This leaves us
with a final conclusion, Mr. Murgia: photograph #19 has been
conclusively proven to be a hoax. All the other photographs thus
taken by Ed Walters are all suspect.

There is no other evidence to support the validity of the Ed
Walters photographs. Ed Walters has refused to take a polygraph
test given not only by myself, but by Rex Salisberry and also
one of the editors of the leading newspaper in the Gulf Breeze
area.

Referring now to your comments about Art Hufford and the object
he saw; Mr. Hufford saw an object in the sky for a few seconds.
His wife, who was interviewed by another UFO investigator,
stated that she only saw the object briefly, for a split second.
Because her husband was driving, she claimed that he could see
it for only a split second also. Both Mr. and Mrs. Hufford
produced a drawing for anyone and everyone to see. This drawing
was shown in an article about the Gulf Breeze/Ed Walters case in
UFO Magazine some years ago. Again, Mr. Art Hufford stated to a
UFO researcher -by telephone- that he did not see any windows on
the object. His wife also stated during the interview with a UFO
researcher, that she did not see any window on the object. All I
am saying to you, Mr. Murgia, is that I watched Art Hufford on
national TV at least two -possibly three- times, saying: "Ed, I
saw the same thing you saw."

Obviously, we have to go by the facts that we have. And the
facts are very clear: while Bruce Maccabee tries to imply that
the size and shape of the object were similar to Ed's makes no
difference, Art Hufford and his wife perceived -in a split
second- an unusual object which had no windows on it.

Thus, when Art Hufford was on national TV twice saying that he
saw the same thing Ed Walters saw, he was lying and continues
that story to this day.

You will have to call Art Hufford and ask him why he said on
national TV that he saw the same thing Ed Walters saw. But there
is no way, based on the evidence and testimony given by Art
Hufford and his wife, that they saw the same thing allegedly
photographed over Ed Walters home.

Mr. Murgia, if you would like more information on the Gulf
Breeze case, I invite you to call me at the number I have
provided on every letter I put on the internet, and I would be
happy to discuss any problems or questions you have about Gulf
Breeze. But don't tell me that I have to prove every photograph
to be a hoax. That is financially impossible and unnecessary. We
have proven photograph #19 conclusively -without question- to be
a hoax, to the contrary of what MUFON or Bruce Maccabee says. If
you want to discuss this and look at this case objectively, you
will see that there is no evidence to support the Ed Walters
photographs.

JERRY BLACK
6276 Taylor Pike
Blanchester, Ohio 45107 (513)
625-2613

Website: http://members.xoom.com/blackshole/

YOU CAN E-MAIL JERRY BLACK AT
blackhole60@hotmail.com