Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here UFOs | Paranormal | Area 51 People | Places | Random Top 100 | What's New Catalog | New Books Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Our Bookstore is OPEN Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1999 -> Jul -> Here

From: Bruce Maccabee <brumac@compuserve.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 23:44:15 -0400
Fwd Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 23:18:44 -0400
Subject: Re: Jerry Black's Open Letter to Friedman


 >From: Jerry Black <blackhole60@hotmail.com>
 >To: updates@globalserve.net
 >Subject: Re: Jerry Black's Open Letter to Friedman
 >Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 07:05:23 PDT

 >Mr. Joe Murgia:

 >I certainly disagree with your analysis that we have to prove
 >every one of Ed Walters' photographs to be a hoax. We have
 >proven conclusively through the work of Mr. William G. Hyzer
 >[and his son James] that photograph #19, the famous road-shot,
 >is without question, a double exposure.>

Hyzer did not prove photo 19 wasa dpouble exposure. Reasons why
he was not able to do so have been provided in numerous previous
posts and publications.

On the other hand, other photos Ed took have no evidence of
double exposure and some argue against it.

Black doesn't understand the significance of the smearing of the
images of the nearby streetlight and the UFO lights in the first
5 photos. The smears are due to camera motion. The smears of the
light and UFO images are in the same directiona dn magnitude.
The identical nature of th two smears is at best, highly
unlikely, and some might say impossible, if a double exposure
where the first exposure (of th model) creates an image smear
(of the model image) by one hand jerk/vibration and the second
exposure creates another image smear (of the
background/streetlight image) with a different hand
jerk/vibration.

As I have published before, the blu beam image in photo 11
contradicts the double exposure hypothesis, as does photo 1 (UFO
partly blocked by tree).

Hufford may well have seen the same object. Black does not
discuss the other witnesses who claimed to have sen the same
thing, such as Dr. McConnell and wife who had a good view for a
couple of minutes and Truman Holcombe who not only saw the
object, but also reported seeing the beam.

Before faling for Black.... read UFOs Are Real, Here'S The Proof.