Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here UFOs | Paranormal | Area 51 People | Places | Random Top 100 | What's New Catalog | New Books Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Our Bookstore is OPEN Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1999 -> Jul -> Here

From: Marc Bell <MARC@wufog.freeserve.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 20:04:13 +0100
Fwd Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 23:53:45 -0400
Subject: Re: Sheffield UFO Incident 2?


 >Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 11:16:51 -0400
 >From: Tony Spurrier <TSpurrier@compuserve.com>
 >Subject: Re: Sheffield UFO Incident 2?
 >To: "updates@globalserve.net" <updates@globalserve.net>

 >>From: Marc Bell <MARC@wufog.freeserve.co.uk>
 >>Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 21:34:46 +0100
 >>Fwd Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 17:30:30 -0400
 >>Subject: Re: Sheffield UFO Incident 2?

 >>From: Roy Hale <roy.hale@virgin.net>
 >>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
 >>Subject: Re: Sheffield UFO Incident 2?
 >>Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 03:43:43 +0100

 >>Also this video evidence (hardly of a 'lower standard'!) is, a)
 >>available for analysis in its original un-cut format direct from
 >>Chris Martin's video camera, b) to my knowledge there have been
 >>witnesses present on most of Chris' footage (inc: myself) and
 >>these can clearly be heard on the soundtracks.

 >Marc,

 >I have never mentioned anything about Chris Martin's video, only
 >Roy and yourself have brought this into play. My original
 >comment was that everyone has a different standard to which they
 >believe a UFO is an ET craft. If you and Roy feel that this
 >video shows an ET craft, then that's fine. But don't drag me in
 >saying that because I've known Roy to make some assumptions
 >before, therefore because Roy believes this video is astounding
 >evidence then I must obviously think it's worthless. The true of
 >the matter is, I haven't seen the footage therefore I cannot
 >comment on it.

 >>What evidence do we need? Surely this must be part of it?

 >I can't say because I haven't seen it, nor has anyone explained
 >what the footage contains. My point originally was exactly your
 >question, what evidence do we need to believe a UFO is a
 >'controlled ET craft'?

 >I hope this makes things a little clearer.


Dear Tony,

I have no interest in personal grudges, back-biting,  or
nit-picking over minor or irrelevent detail.

What I have seen with my own eyes and what I've seen on video
(when I have also been a witness), can only be discribed as
'un-explained'. However in my humble opinion, there is nothing
to say that some of these could be a) structured E.T. craft b)
sky beast

My opinion is also swayed by the fact I have seen one of these
craft recently at close quarters with two witnesses present. It
'blinked' out against a clear blue sky. Perhaps someone on this
list can name a 'man made' craft that can do this.

It is also interesting to note that I was on a mobile phone link
to Chris Martin talking about sightings we had made earlier that
day (on video) and one of the witnesses a few seconds prior to
this was telling me she'd love to see one really close up.... I
can't explain it.

All the best,

Marc Bell