Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here UFOs | Paranormal | Area 51 People | Places | Random Top 100 | What's New Catalog | New Books Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Our Bookstore is OPEN Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1999 -> Jun -> Here

From: Judith Dale <judithdale@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 1999 09:11:50 -0700
Fwd Date: Wed, 02 Jun 1999 22:03:26 -0400
Subject: Re: Biological Evidence Of An Alien Entity?


>Date: Tue, 01 Jun 1999 21:05:52 -0700
>From: Kim Burrafato <lensman@stardrive.org>
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>Subject: Re: Biological Evidence Of An Alien Entity?

>>To: updates@globalserve.net
>>From: Bill Chalker <bill_c@bigpond.com>
>>Subject: Re: Biological Evidence Of An Alien Entity?
>>Date: Sun, 30 May 99 22:40:31 PDT

>>>Date: Sat, 29 May 1999 22:22:32 -0400
>>>From: Paul Badger <pbadger@compuserve.com>
>>>Subject: Re: Biological Evidence Of An Alien Entity?
>>>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>

>><snip>

>>>I haven't read the article, but from the brief reference made to
>>>it on the CUFOS website, I get the impression that the point of
>>>the story is that the hair alleged to have been left behind by
>>>the entity has human DNA, albeit very rare, and not a DNA that
>>>is unrecognisable and thus "alien". Am I right?

><snip>

>>Yes the DNA profile found is "human" but it is "from one of the
>>rarest human lineages known ... that lies further from the
>>(human) mainstream than any other except for African Pygmies and
>>aboriginals".  The DNA sequencing fits only "a Chinese
>>mongoloid" however the hair is blonde, rather than black, as you
>>would expect from a Chinese donor.  Also the source of the hair
>>was an alleged tall blonde haired female, who apart from very
>>unusual "blue" eyes" a few times larger than standard human, and
>>a long narrow face with pinty chin, unusual strength &
>>behaviour, one might type as Scandanavian or dare I say "Nordic"
>>with long exotic blonde hair and fair skin, certainly no Asian
>>like feature.  There were 2 "women" present.  The other looked
>>somewhat Asian in appearance, but had black hair, so she was not
>>an obvious source of the blonde hair which we subjected to PCR
>>DNA testing.

>>As for "human" DNA, we need to consider the widespread reports
>>of "human" like beings in abduction literature - Villas Boas,
>>Travis Walton, there are many more.

>>Then we need to consider are these exotic "human" similar to us
>>in more ways than just appearance.  Is their biological
>>structure also based on a DNA structure.  There are endless
>>questions & speculations here.

>>Also consider "human" type panspermia theories.  Check out
>>Appendix 2 "The Argument for Duplicate Beings" in Paul Davies
>>book "Are We Alone?" (1995) and also the closing paragraphs of
>>Davies book "The Fifth Miracle" (1998).

>>Finally, I once again urge you to read the IUR article.  It is
>>much too detailed and complex to attempt a summary here and
>>beside you will be supporting a very worth while publication -
>>IUR.  You need to have all the data to make an informed
>>response.

>I've been wondering how long it would take for biological trace
>evidence like this to show up.  The fact that the hair is of an
>extremely rare human line -- Chinese mongoloid -- and blonde to
>boot -- is intriguing.  But it's not definitive proof of
>extraterrestrial origin.  My question to those well versed in
>molecular genetics, is what would constitute DNA that could be
>generally regarded as being of non-terrestrial origin?  How
>different would it have to be from the DNA of the simplest
>terrestrial organism in order to be defined as "ET DNA"?  And
>let's not forget, there may be biological entities out there
>that reproduce via an entirely different molecular biochemstry,
>not dependent on DNA/RNA synthesis.


There has been much written regarding the interfacing of humans
and 'aliens', from ancient times to present day. Indeed, thanks
to the hard work of several researchers, much information has
been brought forth from the depths of ancient writings found on
tablets, walls of buildings, walls of caves, rock faces, and
various scrolls or books. Information that seems to indicate a
long history of human and 'alien' involvement. Some of this
information seems to demonstrate that humans, in fact, are the
result of ancient genetic manipulations. Despite Darwin's
'Theory of Evolution', and all of the evidence coming forth from
the work of archeologists and anthropologists, we still seem to
be missing 'the link' between humanity and other similar life
forms on this planet.

I find this new evidence to be intriguing. I do not find it
strange that it appears to be of a rare 'human lineage'. I am
interested, however, to see how the DNA compares with our human
DNA now being mapped in the 'Genome Project'. Perhaps we shall
find that these so called 'aliens' are not so 'alien' after all,
and so merely human types from elsewhere.

Blessings to All,