Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here UFOs | Paranormal | Area 51 People | Places | Random Top 100 | What's New Catalog | New Books Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Our Bookstore is OPEN Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1999 -> Jun -> Here

From: Steven Kaeser <steve@konsulting.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 1999 10:23:58 -0400
Fwd Date: Fri, 04 Jun 1999 11:04:11 -0400
Subject: Re: Voyager Newsletter, Mogul Parchment Parachutes


>Date: Wed, 02 Jun 1999 20:46:23 -0500
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>From: Dennis Stacy <dstacy@texas.net>
>Subject: Re: Voyager Newsletter, Mogul Parchment Parachutes

>>From: David Rudiak <DRudiak@aol.com>
>>Date: Sun, 30 May 1999 21:17:52 EDT
>>Subject: Re: Voyager Newsletter, Mogul Parchment Parachutes
>>To: updates@globalserve.net

><snip>

>> Don't get me started.

><snip>

>>David Rudiak

>Getting you started isn't the problem, believe me.

>Now that you are, however, perhaps you would be so kind as to
>answer the following questions, based on your own mathematical
>analysis of same (And please feel free to call on Maccabee or
>others as required. Hell, if you want, you can even refer to
>Arnold.):

>1) How many non-Mogul alien UFOs crashed at or near Roswell in
>the summer of 1947?

>2) Where and when?

>3) How many bodies were recovered?

>4) Where were they sent? Did they pass through Roswell?

>5) What cover up and investigative organization resulted as a
>consequence?

>6) If MJ-12, please supply proof. If not MJ-12, please supply proof.

>7) Does that mean that you support those MJ-12 documents that
>have surfaced or not?

>8) How much of the Corso/Birnes book is true?

>Sorry to have got you started. But trust you can finish.

>Dennis Stacy

Dennis-

Have you really become so frustrated with the "genre" that you
have to resort to this type of posting?  The subjects you raise
have all been argued to death on this list (and others) and you
throw them out as bait to begin those arguements anew.  The
worst part of it is that you lump them all together, in spite of
the fact that the provenance of each is so vastly different,
which is a tactic used by CISCOP.

Personally, I'd rather be reading discussions about the issues
at hand, rather than discussions about the discussions.

Steve