From: Martin Phillips <mphillips@btinternet.com> Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 20:26:47 +0100 Fwd Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 11:44:13 -0400 Subject: Re: Mad Max: Beyond the Blunderdome >Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 22:42:40 -0400 >From: Nathan Ranger <netrangr@ufo.net> >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net> >Subject: Re: Mad Max: Beyond the Blunderdome >See people, the whole problem with ufology is the fact that >everybody wants it to be what they want it to be so they can say >"See! I _told_ you so!" in order to get that big ________ deal. >[Fill in the blank with whatever you want.] Nobody gives a _damn_ >about what it (it, meaning the UFO mystery) really is, except a >few _and_ those few get the _crap_ riduculed out of them for >following some sort of scientific reasoning. Amen - I've been a subscriber to this List for a year. I'm not a researcher (pompous title?), just a very interested member of the public. I can't believe how quickly any debate turns into a swapping of insults and selective snipping of evidence to back up ideas. >I just >don't like namecalling in ufology. Its unprofessional and >witless.) Damn right. >All researchers have their weak points. They have their areas >that give them navigation trouble. Instead of namecalling, we >should offer help. But, that doesn't happen. >See, thats why they call it "fringe" science. In _real_ science >things like this happen a lot less and there is a cohesive >structure to keep all the data together rather than a bunch of >profit motivated pirahnas trying to tear each other's data >apart, devour it and poop out golden oportunities to make more >profit. What if we went at atomic energy or space flight or >computer engineering this way, the world would be a FUBARed >mess! Get a clue people. I was with you all the way until there. This kind of behaviour happens in the 'real' science world too - it's just that you don't see it unless you look for it. >Who needs government disinformation agents? Just paint a little >blood on all the sharks and watch them eat each other! >Ufological politics is more stupid than US Government politics. >At least with government politics, there is usually a clear >objective: get elected. I can't see the field of UFO research being taken seriously when the level of debate is similar to the arguments that my daughter used to have with her friends a few years ago (and she's only nine now). Isn't it time to stop for just a minute and think about controlling the temper tantrums and egos? Well, I can dream. Martin Phillips
UFO UpDates - Toronto -
updates@globalserve.net
Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp - ++ 416-696-0304
A Hand-Operated E-Mail Subscription Service for the Study of UFO Related
Phenomena.
To subscribe please send your first and last name to
updates@globalserve.net
Message submissions should be sent to the same address.
|
Link it to the appropriate Ufologist or UFO Topic page. |
Archived as a public service by Area 51 Research Center which is not
responsible for content.
Financial support for this web server is provided by the
Research Center Catalog.
Software by Glenn Campbell.
Technical contact:
webmaster@ufomind.com