Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here UFOs | Paranormal | Area 51 People | Places | Random Top 100 | What's New Catalog | New Books Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Our Bookstore is OPEN Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1999 -> Jun -> Here

From: Michel M. Deschamps <ufoman@ican.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 00:55:51 -0400
Fwd Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 09:59:06 -0400
Subject: Re: Kenneth Arnold Sighting


>From: David Rudiak <DRudiak@aol.com>
>Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 00:52:12 EDT
>Subject:  Re: Kenneth Arnold Sighting
>To: updates@globalserve.net

>>From: James Easton <pulsar@compuserve.com>
>>Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 21:44:13 -0400
>>Fwd Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 00:23:10 -0400
>>Subject: Re: Kenneth Arnold Sighting

<snip>

Sorry for butting in, but...

It seems to me that the only people re-hashing classic UFO cases
are those who are absolutely skeptical about UFOs, have never
seen one (or more) or who just don't want to accept that earth
is being visited by (several) alien cultures from elsewhere.

To me, this re-hashing of classic cases (whether it's Kenneth
Arnold, Lonnie Zamorra, or the Paul Trent photo case) seems
pointless.

One day, we will all be straightened out, and I, for one, hope
to be vindicated for the 14 separate sightings I have had.

The time is long overdue for earthlings to know the truth about
flying saucers, UFOs, whatever you want to call them.

Cordially,

Michel M. Deschamps
MUFON Provincial Section Director
for Sudbury, Ontario, Canada &
UFO Researcher/Historian