From: Jenny Randles <nufon@currantbun.com> Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 17:31:00 +0100 Fwd Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 13:25:42 -0400 Subject: Re: Budd Hopkins >From: Roger Evans <moviestuff@cyberjunkie.com> >Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 21:15:00 +0000 >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net> >Subject: Re: Budd Hopkins >Hello all, >I've been tied up in a massive documentary film project for the >last several months and haven't been able to participate in the >list. However, Jenny's statement above reminds me of my first >commercial film project when I was about 24 or so. I used a >piece of copyrighted music without permission (naughty me) and >after handing the film over to a distributor began to feel pangs >of guilt. I asked a friend of mine (who was a lawyer) if I might >really get sued by the music's producers. >His response? "One can only hope so," he said. "For, surely, it >would be an indication of great profits for your little film. >You would have made enough money for them to actually feel >cheated!" >Likewise, we can only hope that Jenny's concerns about impending >lawsuits against ufologists are well founded. Why? Because, for >damages to be proven, the "memories" dredged up by the use of >hypnosis would have to be accepted (at some point) as fact; not >only by the "victim" but by the courts as well. >Despite the aftermath, it will be a welcome day when society and >the courts declare _any_ UFO experience as "real". Though I >personally don't believe hypnosis is worth beans as an >investigative tool, I wouldn't want to prevent Mr. Hopkins or >anyone else from carrying on with their efforts. Sometimes the >ends do justify the means... Hi, Unfortunately, as some of us know, a lawsuit does not have to be valid, justified or taken to court to be damaging. Vindictive suits are becoming common in a litigious society. The prospect of some person sensing an oportunity is there (if not to get money via an out of court settlement then to do so via a tabloid who will see this as a good story even if its legal, moral and factual merits are zilch). Would that such a case could serve to benefit ufology. Sadly it would not. I am not for one moment suggesting such a case would be justified or successful, but I am afraid it could happen regardless. Jenny Randles
UFO UpDates - Toronto -
updates@globalserve.net
Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp - ++ 416-696-0304
A Hand-Operated E-Mail Subscription Service for the Study of UFO Related
Phenomena.
To subscribe please send your first and last name to
updates@globalserve.net
Message submissions should be sent to the same address.
|
Link it to the appropriate Ufologist or UFO Topic page. |
Archived as a public service by Area 51 Research Center which is not
responsible for content.
Financial support for this web server is provided by the
Research Center Catalog.
Software by Glenn Campbell.
Technical contact:
webmaster@ufomind.com