Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here UFOs | Paranormal | Area 51 People | Places | Random Top 100 | What's New Catalog | New Books Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Our Bookstore is OPEN Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1999 -> Jun -> Here

From: David Clarke <crazydiamonds@compuserve.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 12:05:41 -0400
Fwd Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 20:25:12 -0400
Subject: Re: Max Burns Hoax Exposed


>From: "Matthew Williams" <truthseekers@truthseekers.screaming.net>
>Subject: Re: Max Burns Hoax Exposed
>Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 20:31:25 +0100
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>

>To note: Dr David Clarke recently discredited his own research,
>the fact of the matter is that Dr Clark maintains that the cause
>of the whole nights events was due to a covert low flying
>excercise which involved six tornados launched from RAF Marham
>that evening. This excerise culminated in a couple of pilots
>accidentally breachoing the sound barrier whilst performing mid
>air turns, which gave light to a number of misidentifications of
>said aircraft culminating in a number of UFO reports as well as
>a light aircraft etc etc et al.

>The problem is that the (Sheffield) seismic events occured at
>21.52 at 22.06 however from Dr Clarks own research PRO (Public
>Relations Officer) Ed Bullpit that all six aircraft were safely
>on the ground by 21.35 therefore how could the covert low flying
>excerise possibly be the cause for events which happened 17
>minutes and 31 minutes after the air group had landed
>respectively. The covert low flying excerise could not possibly
>be the explaintaion for the nights events. Unless Dr Clark can
>explain how landed aircraft can be the cause of such events, if
>that is your case Dr Clark, then you do not have a case. Please
>explain how this discrepancy could occur.

Max never fails to amaze and entertain. No one has to lead him
up the garden path, as he is quite capable of doing that
entirely by himself His ability to misinterpret, distort and
misreprent facts really does deserve some kind of special award;
as I've said before he is simply incapable of interpreting any
kind of evidence correctly. Nowhere have I ever claimed that six
specific aircraft from any specific airbase were the cause of
the sonic booms recorded near Sheffield on March 24, 1997.

That is a simple fact, something neither Max nor his
"Truthseeker" friends could bring themselves to accept.

For the benefit of the hard of hearing, I reproduce the relevant
section from the conclusions to my Howden Moor report which
demonstrates once again how Max is incapable of telling the
truth:

>There clearly was a military exercise taking place centred upon
>the Peak District that night, one phase of which (now officially
>admitted) is timed from 7.30-9.30pm, when the RAF claim all
>their aircraft were safely grounded and accounted for. However,
>the evidence from both witnesses in Derbyshire and South
>Yorkshire and the sonic booms recorded by the BGS suggest a
>covert part of this operation continued after the booked
>operation had been officially completed. Many more aircraft were
>involved in this exercise than has been officially admitted as
>is clear from the 13 low-flying complaints lodged with the RAF
>on March 24 from widely separated areas of the British
>coastline.

>It is clear that a formation of Tornado aircraft travelled
>across the Peak District on a southeast to northwest flightpath
>between 9.45 and 10pm, coinciding with the first of two sonic
>booms recorded 12 minutes apart from the Sheffield area.

Discredited my own research?

I think not!