Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here UFOs | Paranormal | Area 51 People | Places | Random Top 100 | What's New Catalog | New Books Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Our Bookstore is OPEN Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1999 -> Mar -> Here

From: Royce J. Myers III <rjm3@sprintmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 20:57:39 -0800
Fwd Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 10:51:41 -0500
Subject: Bell - Facts vs. Fraud and Confusion


>Date: Tue, 09 Mar 1999 21:36:11 -0700
>From: Ron Bach <roam5@utinet.com>
>To: updates@globalserve.net <And Others>
>Subject: Re: Bell is no Rense

>Jeff Rense also provided me with a venue to challenge Richard
>Hoagland alongside Steven Greer and Greer camp has since
>answered the questions and treated me very kindly and decently.

>I doubt that had my article not been posted on Jeff Rense's site,
>Greer camp may not have seen the necessity to answer and
>clarify. They did; and very convincingly. So please leave Jeff
>Rense or any other Journalists, Reporters out of this squabble.

Let me first say how _sincerely_ sorry I am to hear that Richard
has suffered a heart attack. My father has had three serious
heart attacks, I know what Richard's family and friends are all
going through. I sincerely wish Richard nothing but the best for
a full and speedy recovery from this unfortunate happening.

Bell,

Your comments about Rense and his show somehow having a direct
relationship to Richard's current health problems is total crap.

Rense has left an open invitation to Richard Hoagland (and
others) several times to appear on his program and answer claims
made against him. Yet few who appear on your program have taken
Rense up on his invitation. Why? Because they know Rense will ask
the real hard questions and won't just let them present any
ramblings to the public...Rense doesn't allow a free-for-all
format. His program presents both sides. You can't say the same.

Remember Chuck Schrameck? You had him on the air
crying wolf even after Linda Howe gave you the straight facts.
You were _extremely_ rude to Linda on your Dreamland program when
she presented evidence showing Schrameck's data was grossly
incorrect. You brushed her off and brought Schrameck back on the
air, dramatically announcing, "Now the other side of the story!"
You might as well have told Linda to get lost the way you treated
her. Why Linda wastes her time and talent on your program is
beyond me.

How about this: You criticize Rense on your program (of course
not having the balls to refer to him by name) as not being a
responsible broadcaster...I have two words for you: Hale-Bopp.

Oh, and let's not forget your melodramatic resignation which
you seemed to mention at every opportunity you had when you
returned to the air waves. That really seems out of character for
a man who said he didn't want to subject his family to anything
negative and was in some kind of terrible danger. If I'm wrong
about this, you can always tell us what happened.:)

Regarding proven frauds, you said that no responsible
broadcaster "would continue to give space or air time to this
kind of dribble." Yet you constantly continue to showcase a
parade of frauds on your show.

Isn't Robert Ghostwolf posing as a Native American?

And how about Dr. Jonathan Reed?

You had this fraud on your program and later received plenty of
evidence that his story was bogus. But instead of presenting
that evidence you chose to have Reed and his dirtbag partner
Raith back on the program twice.

You insulted the people who sent you the evidence (myself
sending it to you twice at _your_ request after I contacted you)
by calling them "pixel counters". You even questioned the
credentials of one person who contacted you regarding the
inconsistencies in Reed's photos. Too bad you can't be critical
of your guests.

Of course, you claim it's all "just entertainment."

You went on to endorse this fraud by exclaiming that the bogus
photos you received were printed on real Kodak paper. Never mind
the fact that I informed you via e-mail _and_ fax that there are
digital imaging systems that print digital photos on actual Kodak
paper. I can't speak for this person, but you even let Reed
associate Peter Davenport's good name with that shameless scam.

And let's not forget when the $1,000,000 UFO/EBE Challenge was
made to Reed. You apparently didn't like that and sent one of
your puppets to cloud up the issue by claiming you were owed the
million dollars for the scraps of metal you have. Why you didn't
come and make that claim yourself is still a mystery.

The criticism of Hoagland does indeed seem justified.

Hoagland not responding to the charges doesn't make him look any
better.

You said the "personal attacks" against Hoagland were being
perpetrated for "some mysterious reason by another website and
radio program, a reason that I simply cannot discern."

It really isn't that mysterious and if you had actually taken
the time to see what was being said you'd be aware that people
are charging Hoagland with plagiarism, an _extremely_ serious
charge among researchers in any circle.

It isn't a flake like Robert A.M. Stephens rambling.

Ralph Greenberg (professor of Mathematics, Seattle, WA.) says he
faxed you on several occasions regarding Hoagland's claim that
he wrote the first scientific paper regarding water on Europa.

Then there are the charges of Hoagland using photos from Egypt
that don't even belong to him.

Good grief, Hoagland has stuck a (C) copyright on a page with
the Egypt pictures and is using images from Star Wars.

Not once does the site give any reference or copyright credit to
anyone but the Enterprise Mission and Richard Hoagland.

I'm sure LucasFilm would not be too happy with that fact. You
seem to like ignoring information when it doesn't suit you.

At least Rense had the courtesy and standards to present the
findings of others on his program, which were _totally_ ignored
by you.

You seem to ignore people that challenge you or your guests in
any way. I've said this more than once: Don't cut yourself and
then point a bloody finger at someone else.

Regards,

Royce J. Myers III