From: Tim Matthews <matthews@zetnet.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 18:21:04 -0000
Fwd Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 07:21:38 -0500
Subject: Re: {100} Part 2 - United Kingdom UFO Network
>From: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>To: UFO UpDates Subscribers:;
>Subject: UFO UpDate: Re: {100} Part 2 - United Kingdom UFO Network
>Date: 15 March 1999 15:39
>Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1999 23:50:09 -0500
>From: Bruce Maccabee <brumac@compuserve.com>
>Subject: Re: {100} Part 2 - United Kingdom UFO Network
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>>Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 14:17:49 +0000
>>From: Lloyd Bayliss <lloyd@POWER-AGE.DEMON.CO.UK>
>>To: UFO@MAELSTROM.STJOHNS.EDU
>>Subject: {100} Part 2 - United Kingdom UFO Network
>>INTERVIEW OF TIM MATHHEWS:
>><Assassin>ask him this if you don't believe then why are there
>>thousands of ppl claiming they have been ubducted by aliens
>><T_Matthew>There are not thousands of people - just a bunch of
>>well-paid story tellers and believers telling you this. These
>Well paid story tellers? The abductees? Better tell them.
>They're still waiting for that first paycheck
So these 'abductees' writing books and having books written
about them are not being paid a penny? Didn't Pamela
Stonebrooke get paid $50,000 for her book.
(If I'm mistaken forget an apology!)
I heard her on UK 'Talk Radio' recently - madness, sheer
madness..but profitable madness nevertheless.....?
Methinks that you are forgetting the UFO INDUSTRY.......it's
worth millions.
><snip>
>><JeroenW>Tim, have you researched the M-12 stuff, ultimately coming
>>to the conclusion that its all rubbish?
>><T_Matthew>Yes, I've got all the documents (well nearly all) and spent
>>a great deal of time looking into them and asking people all the
>>difficult questions. To me the thing starts off with a lie; "On 24th
>>June 1947....Kenneth Arnold saw 9 flying discs". No he didn't. There
>Huh? He didn't see 9 flying discs? Then what did Arnold report?
Good question Bruce and I think we've debated this before. One
of his drawings was of a Horten wing but as you have agreed
there are tremendous problems with the sighting........It was
the media who decided to give birth to the terms 'flying
saucers' - and not really Kenneth Arnold who was attempting to
describe the motion of the objects he saw..........
Hear from you soon,
Tim X
UFO UpDates - Toronto -
updates@globalserve.net
Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp - ++ 416-696-0304
A Hand-Operated E-Mail Subscription Service for the Study of UFO Related
Phenomena.
To subscribe please send your first and last name to
updates@globalserve.net
Message submissions should be sent to the same address.
|
Link it to the appropriate Ufologist or UFO Topic page. |
Archived as a public service by Area 51 Research Center which is not
responsible for content.
Financial support for this web server is provided by the
Research Center Catalog.
Software by Glenn Campbell.
Technical contact:
webmaster@ufomind.com