Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1999 -> May -> Re: First 'Grey' Report?

UFO UpDates Mailing List

From: Jesus Millan Arias <jesusmillan@mx3.redestb.es>
Date: Sun, 9 May 1999 17:06:20 +0200
Fwd Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 13:15:26 -0400
Subject: Re: First 'Grey' Report? 


>From: Kathleen Andersen <KAnder6444@aol.com>
>Date: Sat, 8 May 1999 13:05:18 EDT
>Subject: Re: First 'Grey' Report?
>To: updates@globalserve.net

>Hi Jerry, Jenny and Jesus,

>The first story about "greys" was told to me in 1974 while
>living in Alamogordo New Mexico. A fellow co-worker had an
>experience, in the 60's in Colorado when he was driving up in
>the mountains and came across 3 small beings, grey (appearing to
>be in a suit), digging as if testing soil or mineral content. He
>claimed that many people in Colorado at this time had many
>stories and encounters.

>I am planning to go to Alamogordo this fall and am planning on
>doing some research again. Other than my first hand account
>above, my only memory of  reading about greys was  the  case in
>Italy in August 13, 1947 reported by APRO.


Hi all, hi Kathleen, Jenny

I have the book "Los humanoides" from year 1966 (Spanish
translation). I don=B4t have the original English version, but in
this book, the acount named "Villa Santina" was august 14, 1947.
Do you speaks about the same?. If this is the report, I don=B4t
have read any reference about a "typical" grey. (perhaps because
a bad Spanish translation?).


From your posts, there is no good account about "typical
grays" before 1965.

I agree, in part, with Jenny when comments:

"I agree that the explanation need not be - as I suspect it is -
that the form that an entity takes during an account is a
product of the mental images in a persons consciousness. But I
think that is a reasonable hypothesis. Not that this eliminates
the prospect of some actual intelligence being in contact."

But, why the "typical" grey presence appears from 1965
and not, p.ex. from 1950, or 1900?. Is the human conciousness
"changing" so fast?.

The old accounts about beings are like "human" type
(p.ex."angelic" or "dwarfs" etc.) but on ancient records (I
don=B4t have) no "greys". But even if the only motive for their
presence (I=B4m speaking only of "grays") was a "product of mental
images in a person's consciousness", or perhaps representation
changing with the witness culture, which could be the motivation
for their appearance now? For their presence from 1965 forward
(perhaps are they the same old beings?) In this form?. Are they
the same old beings disguised? Or they are some others newest
ones?.

I think that this question could be resumed in six
possibilities:

1. They are here from long time ago but we still without finding
any 1960 record. In this case we could/should find one.

2. They could be disguised. In this case it could be very hard
for us to distinguish.

3. It could be some mental/medical problem. I think it is not
the case, specially if we could find also physical marks.

4. It is really the human unconscious that "invented" or
"forming" all visions?. The answer could be resumed like
previous.

5. The human unconscious are"changing" and could represent with
other image the same things. But, it could be changing so
faster?.

6. It could be an "experiment" or test (Milabs possibility).

If we could find some previous 1960 account, then we would be
able to reject the two last possibilities. In this case, we
would have only the two first posibilities.

I=B4m still very interested and I would like to know more about
the 1933 australian account (p. ex. who really was the
researcher Rex Gilroy, if it was a good researcher, his
reliability).

thank you

Jesus