Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1999 -> May -> Re: 2nd Mars 'Face' Artefact Genuine - USGS

UFO UpDates Mailing List

From: Larry Hatch <larryhat@jps.net>
Date: Sun, 09 May 1999 17:38:05 -0700
Fwd Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 16:30:46 -0400
Subject: Re: 2nd Mars 'Face' Artefact Genuine - USGS


>Date: Sat, 08 May 1999 09:52:28 -0700
>From: Mitch Battros <earthcng@earthlink.net>
>To: Breaking News <earthcng@earthlink.net>
>Subject: Earth Changes TV/Breaking News

>The 2nd Face On Mars Photo's Are Real...05/08/99
>by Mitch Battros (ECTV)

>There has now been a second confirmation from the USGS stating
>the NASA photo's are authentic. This could be the find of the
>decade. Remember, Nostradamus predicted "1999 is the year of
>DISCLOSURE". Below you will see the two letters from the USGS,
>along with two links to the photo's themselves.

>Dear Mitch,

>The URL goes to one of the machines here at the U. S. Geological
>Survey. The WWW system (Mars Explorer for the Armchair
>Astronaut) was developed here for NASA and we maintain it. So I
>think the answer is yes, it is an authentic site for NASA data,
>meant to be a resource for researchers and the general public.

>I have looked at the original Viking images in this area and
>they look essentially the same, so I do not believe that the
>imagery you are looking at has been tampered with in any way.

<snip>

Dear Mitch, Eric and others:

What do I see?

I see craters, ridges etc. of all sizes and types, plus some
rough surfaces and other now typical natural features.

I cannot find anything vaguely resembling a face, unless you are
referring to the top portion of link #1 above. Here, two craters
of roughly equal size straddle a ridge from an older larger
crater.. vaguely suggesting eyes and a nose.

If you want to call that a "face", and most especially an
artificial construct of some kind, be my guest .. but count me
out.

It is a nice clear image BTW.

Best wishes

- Larry Hatch