Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1999 -> May -> Re: 2nd Mars Face A Hoax

UFO UpDates Mailing List

From: Nathan Ranger <netrangr@ufo.net>
Date: Sun, 09 May 1999 21:26:56 -0400
Fwd Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 16:30:12 -0400
Subject: Re: 2nd Mars Face A Hoax


I have three theories about any data being "hacked" on this
subject of Mars Anomalies. I have never been an expert in this
field, however, I have kept up with the developments in general
since it runs somewhat parallel and at times overlaps some of my
UFO sighting and abduction research. The following three
theories have been in the back of my subconscious for some
years.

Theory 1: There must be something so darn important that NASA
does not want us to see that they have their best and finest
combination image scientists and graphic artists working full
time on incoming pictures so as to keep us from discovering
anything.

Anti Theory 1: However, if there is so much at stake and it
takes so many man hours for theory 1 to be in place, why not
just say: CLASSIFIED. Don't show any of the images. Keep the
public eye off of them. After all, even with the finest people
working on the images to mask this important data, there is
still a chance of mistakes *AND* the fact that there could be a
leak that would A) Damage NASA's reputation and B) Leak the
important information. If the information was kept under wraps
then leakage could be dismissed as the product of over active
crackpot imaginations.

Theory 2: All these anomalies we're seeing are just natural
things on the surface of mars. Since the atmosphere, geology and
general characteristics of mars is very different from the
earth, things that look to us to be anomalous ON THE EARTH may
not be anomalous on mars. Don't get me wrong, I think they
certainly look anomalous, however, it seems that after enough
anomalous findings come out, they aren't anomalies anymore.

Anti Theory 2: There just seems to be too much stuff that
doesn't make sense for it all to be just natural windblown and
seismic generated artifacts.

Theory 3: Its a combination of both T1 and T2. If there was
enough information in these images that were "threatening", I
think NASA would just shut off the archive and forget about it.
However, if there were just a few *AND* there was a situation
where there were some anomalous looking natural phenomena,
they'd do it just like they are. Modify a few, leave a few and
just try to confuse us with a little mix of truth and
disinformation.

Anti Theory 3: It may be that theory 1 is more truth than we
think if NASA thinks they're smart enough and the general public
is A) dumb enough and B) trusting enough that they can just pull
any kind of hacking/cover up/disinformation campaign they want
without us ever knowing. After all, most of the general public
thinks the other part of the general public are crackpots when
they ask hard questions about what is REALLY going on.

Am I making any sense or do I sound like just another crackpot
in the mix?

-NR (http://www.ufo.net)