Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here UFOs | Paranormal | Area 51 People | Places | Random Top 100 | What's New Catalog | New Books Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Our Bookstore is OPEN Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1999 -> May -> Here

From: GBourdais@aol.com
Date: Thu, 27 May 1999 12:38:40 EDT
Fwd Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 08:42:11 -0400
Subject: Re: Biological Evidence Of An Alien Entity?


>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>From: Jerome Clark <jkclark@frontiernet.net>
>Subject: IUR: Biological Evidence Of An Alien Entity?
>Date: Wed, 26 May 99 09:38:07 PDT

>Gentle listfolk:

>The lead article is a long piece by the highly regarded
>Australian ufologist Bill Chalker, a chemist by profession,
>documenting his investigation of an abduction case with sexual
>overtones. The incident turns out to be more than just another
>intriguing, unverified story. To all indications, one of the
>alien entities left biological evidence of her presence behind,
>evidence which Chalker took to a group of qualified scientists
>for DNA analysis, with surprising and remarkable results.  The
>scientists' report, which follows Chalker's article, raises a
>host of extraordinary and suggestive new questions.

>This explosive case is bound to be the focus of discussion and
>debate in the weeks, months, and maybe years to come, and it's
>something every ufologist should read. >>

Yes, this is a very important research!

If biological evidence of alien nature is to be confirmed, it
will be a "smoking gun" of the alien presence on Earth ! Just as
well as implants, or UFO debris, would be. But we are still
waiting for that.

This brings another question : we have been discussing for many
years on the hybrid hypothesis, without definite proof. What
about DNA analysis, made on suspected hybrids who would accept
such an analysis ? Perhaps it is done already, but kept
confidential for obvious reasons.

I talked about that with Budd Hopkins when I had the chance to
meet him in Brazilia, in December 1997. He told me that he did
not want to get involved in such a study, not only for that
reason - confidentiality , and human decency - but for legal
reasons as well.

I think we should consider seriously a very grim prospect if
some people were to become proven hybrids (or an equivalent of
that). The problems encountered by Linda Cortile with the two
bodyguard give us a lot to think about. And also the dark
visions of fundamentalists
chasing the devils. What about the ominous risk a "hybrid hunt" ?

Gildas Bourdais