Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1999 -> May -> Re: Protocol Bookburning Conspiracy

UFO UpDates Mailing List

From: Allison Reed <allison_rd@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 19:45:46 PDT
Fwd Date: Sat, 29 May 1999 12:33:10 -0400
Subject: Re: Protocol Bookburning Conspiracy


>From: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>To: "UFO UpDates Subscribers":;
>Subject: UFO UpDate: Re: Protocol Bookburning Conspiracy
>Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 07:38:47 -0400

>Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 00:25:21 -0500
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>From: Dennis Stacy <dstacy@texas.net>
>Subject: Re: Protocol Bookburning Conspiracy

>To no one in particular:

>There are two items (which isn't to say there aren't more) of
>which ufology must seriously and finally disabuse itself if it
>ever hopes to gain the widespread scientific support it so
>eagerly and allegedly seeks.

>The first of these is the notion that some sort of
>comprehensive, coordinated, air-tight conspiracy is in place now
>and has always been. That is, that MJ-12, or something very
>similar to same, exists, and has somehow been able to cover up
>the "truth" worldwide for nigh on half a century. Such a notion
>is absurd on its face.

>The second absurd assumption, also taken for granted by many
>ufologists, portrays a world besieged by a massive invasion of
>human-abducting, sperm-sucking, egg-extracting aliens, 3-4
>million, by some accounts, in this country alone.

>Stand back from both of these "claims" for just a minute or two
>and see if the patent absurdity of both doesn't wash over you
>like a breath of fresh, reinvigorating air.

>Common sense tells you that neither assertion has a hope of
>being true.

>That's right, simple common sense. Has everyone forgotten what
>common sense is _for_?

>Or is it something that we're all supposed to check at the UFO
>front door? And then wonder why the scientific community isn't
>overly eager to do the same?

>What _were_ you people thinking?


Mr. Stacy,

I have a question for you, sir;  Why are you here?

It is quite obvious that you have established firmly in your
mind where your beliefs are on the issues as are stated above.
It is clear that you post not to learn, question, nor even
debate the issues.  Your post above is nothing more than a lame
attempt to muddy waters, ruffle feathers, and stir people up.
That being the case, I ask you again;  Why are you here?

You have already answered for yourself any question there may
have been regarding conspiracy theories or alien abductions.
You first made up your mind, and now have subsequently closed
it.  You want to hear nothing of anyone else's thoughts and
theories.  So, why are you here?

Common sense tugs at me to ask you this question.

Regards,
Allison Reed