Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 1999 -> May -> Re: Biological Evidence Of An Alien Entity?

UFO UpDates Mailing List

From: Bill Chalker <bill_c@bigpond.com>
Date: Sun, 30 May 99 22:40:31 PDT
Fwd Date: Sun, 30 May 1999 11:39:37 -0400
Subject: Re: Biological Evidence Of An Alien Entity?


>Date: Sat, 29 May 1999 22:22:32 -0400
>From: Paul Badger <pbadger@compuserve.com>
>Subject: Re: Biological Evidence Of An Alien Entity?
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>

<snip>

>I haven't read the article, but from the brief reference made to
>it on the CUFOS website, I get the impression that the point of
>the story is that the hair alleged to have been left behind by
>the entity has human DNA, albeit very rare, and not a DNA that
>is unrecognisable and thus "alien". Am I right?

I expected my IUR article to create some controversy, but
probably not before people have had a chance to read it (eg.
Paul Badger). Yes Paul there is a lot more to this than the few
lines you have made some premature conclusions from.

I urge you to read the IUR piece first.  It is a complex and
detailed piece (15 pages) and then perhaps comment further.

Yes the DNA profile found is "human" but it is "from one of the
rarest human lineages known ... that lies further from the
(human) mainstream than any other except for African Pygmies and
aboriginals".  The DNA sequencing fits only "a Chinese
mongoloid" however the hair is blonde, rather than black, as you
would expect from a Chinese donor.  Also the source of the hair
was an alleged tall blonde haired female, who apart from very
unusual "blue" eyes" a few times larger than standard human, and
a long narrow face with pinty chin, unusual strength &
behaviour, one might type as Scandanavian or dare I say "Nordic"
with long exotic blonde hair and fair skin, certainly no Asian
like feature.  There were 2 "women" present.  The other looked
somewhat Asian in appearance, but had black hair, so she was not
an obvious source of the blonde hair which we subjected to PCR
DNA testing.

As for "human" DNA, we need to consider the widespread reports
of "human" like beings in abduction literature - Villas Boas,
Travis Walton, there are many more.

Then we need to consider are these exotic "human" similar to us
in more ways than just appearance.  Is their biological
structure also based on a DNA structure.  There are endless
questions & speculations here.

Also consider "human" type panspermia theories.  Check out
Appendix 2 "The Argument for Duplicate Beings" in Paul Davies
book "Are We Alone?" (1995) and also the closing paragraphs of
Davies book "The Fifth Miracle" (1998).

Finally, I once again urge you to read the IUR article.  It is
much too detailed and complex to attempt a summary here and
beside you will be supporting a very worth while publication -
IUR.  You need to have all the data to make an informed
response.

Regards,

Bill Chalker