UFO UpDates Mailing List
From: Terry Evans <tevans@tranquility.net> Date: Sun, 03 Oct 1999 10:59:02 -0500 Fwd Date: Sun, 03 Oct 1999 17:24:46 -0400 Subject: Re: Bruce Maccabee and Gulf Breeze Photos >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net> >From: Jerome Clark <jkclark@frontiernet.net> >Subject: Re: Bruce Maccabee and Gulf Breeze Photos >Date: Fri, 01 Oct 99 13:12:18 PDT >>Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 13:06:58 -0500 >>From: Terry Evans <tevans@tranquility.net> >>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net> >>Subject: Re: Bruce Maccabee and Gulf Breeze Photos >>>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net> >>>From: Jerome Clark <jkclark@frontiernet.net> >>>Subject: Re: Bruce Maccabee and Gulf Breeze Photos >>>Date: Wed, 29 Sep 99 22:30:23 PDT >>>>Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 12:51:54 -0400 >>>>From: Kenny Young <ufo@fuse.net> >>>>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net> >>>>Subject: Re: Bruce Maccabee and Gulf Breeze Photos >>>>>From: Brian Straight <brians@mdbs.com> >>>>>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net> >>>>>Subject: Re: Bruce Maccabee and Gulf Breeze Photos >>>>>Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 12:01:05 -0500 >>Your polemics are tiring. You write for yourself. I no longer >>read anything you write. Ooops. This slipped through. Guess I'll respond. Lucky you. >Translation: You know you lost the argument but can't bring >yourself to offer the apology I would happily accept. You are funny. Ever thought about taking your act on the road? >I don't think you're a bad guy. I can tell as much from other >posts you've made, unrelated to our dispute. It's my judgment >you simply stepped into something without realizing what you >were getting into. I guess the old warning applies: Look before >you leap. (You are even condescending when you feign niceness.) First, I don't care what you think of me, caring what someone thinks comes when you respect that person. I don't respect you any longer. (I know, Booo hooo). Second I stand by what I said before and let me tweak it up a bit. You are part of the problem with Ufology not the solution. There has always been a private elite within Ufology who have controlled who did what, and what information was released back to the to the field investigators who did most of the collection. This was mostly MUFON. As for CUFOS, I know from past personal experience, that there is a clique. Third, I have no idea who you are talking about, but the person you think is my "source" is not my source on you and Gulf Breeze. My source was then and is now, a CUFOS insider. (Part of the non- existent clique.) Fourth, I firmly believe that you did not want to step on Dr. Maccabee's toes regarding Gulf Breeze. (That should probably include Mr. Hopkins since he wrote a chapter.) Dr. M was then and still is a major player in the Fund. And while the Fund is supposed to be non-partisan its not nice to piss off people who someday you might need. Fifth, I know exactly what I stepped into. Terry Evans.
UFO UpDates - Toronto -
updates@globalserve.net
Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp - ++ 416-696-0304
A Hand-Operated E-Mail Subscription Service for the Study of UFO Related
Phenomena.
To subscribe please send your first and last name to
updates@globalserve.net
Message submissions should be sent to the same address.
|
Link it to the appropriate Ufologist or UFO Topic page. |
Archived as a public service by Area 51 Research Center which is not
responsible for content.
Financial support for this web server is provided by the
Research Center Catalog.
Software by Glenn Campbell.
Technical contact:
webmaster@ufomind.com