UFO UpDates Mailing List
From: Terry Evans <tevans@tranquility.net> Date: Sun, 19 Sep 1999 08:27:28 -0500 Fwd Date: Sun, 19 Sep 1999 10:40:44 -0400 Subject: Re: Nick Pope'S Weird World - Sept '99 >From: Tim Matthews <matthews@zetnet.co.uk> >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net> >Subject: Re: Nick Pope'S Weird World - Sept '99 >Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 08:15:19 +0100 >>Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 09:45:45 -0500 >>From: Amy Hebert <yelorose@swbell.net> >>Subject: Re: Nick Pope'S Weird World - Sept '99 >>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net> >><snip> >>We must consider the possibility that animal mutilations may be >>part of some psychological program intended to impact human >>belief systems in certain ways or as part of some kind of >>psychological experiment. We must also consider the possibility >>that animal mutilations - the parts excised, procedures used, >>positions in which the animals are found, etc. - may have _no_ >>meaning whatsoever (same for crop circles) aside from their >>psychological effects on human paradigms. The problem with impacting the human belief system is that very few humans know animal mutilation exists. If it were done to frighten humans it would need to be more highly publicized. >>One important pattern in all mutilations, speculations aside, is >>the very presence of a corpse as opposed to no corpse at all. >We must also consider that in some cases; >- There _are_ loonies out there. Very sick ones at that. Maybe >they bought scalpels..... The religious cult/loonies has been disregarded years ago. >- Farmers can claim off their insurance if it's 'death by >unknown causes'. Picked this up off an insurance colleague. Yes they can, but the deductible is usually high, more that the animals value. >- Most of this seems to be happening in the USA and is pushed by >a small group of researchers who are _still_ been unable to prove >that extra-terrestrials are responsible. They are making modern >Ufology more like a sick snuff movie...not a credible research >effort. That's an unfair comment. The bottom line is that there are animals that are being tortured and killed and whether anyone likes to think it or not, they feel just like we do. So it doesn't matter who is doing it, it matters that it is being done and it needs to stop. >Has a vet ever said that in his/her view "aliens" are >responsible for 'mutilations' and if so why is he/she still >practicing? As an aside: many years ago I remember hearing about a case where a woman claimed her vehicle had been damaged by a UFO... and the insurance company paid! True story. That should set some precedent. Terry Evans
UFO UpDates - Toronto -
updates@globalserve.net
Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp - ++ 416-696-0304
A Hand-Operated E-Mail Subscription Service for the Study of UFO Related
Phenomena.
To subscribe please send your first and last name to
updates@globalserve.net
Message submissions should be sent to the same address.
|
Link it to the appropriate Ufologist or UFO Topic page. |
Archived as a public service by Area 51 Research Center which is not
responsible for content.
Financial support for this web server is provided by the
Research Center Catalog.
Software by Glenn Campbell.
Technical contact:
webmaster@ufomind.com