From: Mike Farrell <vidhunter@hotmail.com> Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2000 09:42:18 +0000 (GMT) Fwd Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2000 08:40:17 -0400 Subject: UpDate: Carpenter's OZ Video - Cahill Speaks Greetings, Just to show you we haven't made this whole thing up, here's a reply from one of the participants in the video released by John Carpenter entitled 'Encounters in Australia' See UFO UpDates Archive 'Carpenter's OZ Video-Rumors and Facts' for more details at: http://www.ufomind.com/ufo/updates/2000/aug/m07-008.shtml The name is Kelly Cahill, and she was interviewed for the video and confirms that she and others were mislead by John Carpenter, who told the participants that their interviews would be kept private. Carpenter then released them on a commercial video soon afterwards. Now, compared to the damage done to the abductees whose files were sold by Carpenter, this matter of the misrepresented Australian video interviews is very small. The participants involved with the video interviews do not want to pursue Carpenter any further at this point. This is being brought to your attention only to illustrate that the "professional misconduct" displayed by Carpenter is not an isolated incident 'out of character', but shows a definite and disturbing pattern of total disregard for patient confidentiality and the common standards of honesty and integrity within the UFO Research Community. You can find out more about Kelly Cahill's celebrated roadside abduction case, corroborated by independent witnesses, near Melbourne in 1993, by going to any Australian UFO website or referring to her book 'Encounter' (Harper Collins 1996) or see Bill Chalker's book 'The OZ Files' (Duffy & Snellgrove 1996) Let me preface her remarks by pointing out that Kelly was responding to posts on this subject from Australian and other mailing lists, and in particular to a post calling for the Global UFO Research Community to "Boycott" the Carpenter/MUFON/NIDS coalition by refusing to 'buy' any more of their books, videos, or lectures until they publicly recognise and correct their "professional misconduct". I would also like to point out that what Kelly expresses about the UFO politics in Australia can also be said for many other countries as you all know very well. But that doesn't excuse the fact that Carpenter's file-sale could be considered the greatest offence against the credibility and integrity of the UFO Research Community since big-time UFO Researcher and Roswell Invesigator Bill Moore proclaimed he was an active dis-information agent for the US Government a decade ago. Here's the first and only response from Kelly Cahill with her permission to post on all mailing lists following the 'Carpenter Case'. I don't personally agree with all her comments, but I'll let you decide for yourself what rings true for you. _____________________________________ From: xxxxx.xxx (Kelly-Cahill) To: "Mike Farrell" <vidhunter@hotmail.com> Subject: Re: To Boycott or not to Boycott "Carpenter"? Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2000 Dear Mike, In many ways I agree with the letter of John Valez, which opposed calling for a "boycott" against Carpenter. The bitchiness and "lets kill 'em all" attitude in Australian UFO politics is the main reason I have stayed out of the field in this country for the past few years. Yet I have been welcomed with open arms in other countries without my contribution being a threat to others in the field as it appears to be here. I have seen many dirty deeds done against other people from researchers in this country... maybe if I took them up as public issues we could boycott half the Australian research community... (bet that has a few people quivering in their shoes... hehe). Honestly, I am one of the people who has been mistreated by John with the video scenario... but I personally had that out with him long ago. People do stupid and greedy things... The buyer of John's files is not an unknown quantity in the global UFO field and has certainly funded many events and researchers. These files did not go on public display for the world... but to another involved in the field. It could have been a lot worse... they could have been sold to the media instead... then everyone would have something to really complain about. Could it be that there is a certain amount of jealousy over the fact that someone actually got paid something? If you were to be funded by a millionaire... would you pass that opportunity up? Also what of the research organisations that change hands? Are the new officials entitled to peruse the files of experiencers? Again, is talk and gossip about file contents of experiencers not just as harmful as the actual hardcopy data? Because if so, then just about every researcher I have ever met is guilty of it. To be honest, I am not happy with John Carpenter for my own personal reasons... but I don't like the witch-hunt attitude in this country's politics... and the absolute determination to destroy someone. I have had another Australian researcher take a private discussion I had with him and spout off to an American publication about it... very personal information. Again I was very upset, but did not see the need to force him out of the UFO field. There are other incidents that I could discuss in detail... but what on earth for? I know this sounds callous and may be taken that way by other experiencers... but it really isn't. I am in favor with more data being shared between credible researchers, rather than hoarded and jealously guarded. For example, if one researcher was working on a project, it would be good for other researchers to be able to contribute what data they have that they may think to be of use for the particular project. Not that I am saying that this is what John has done... cause obviously it isn't. But I think experiencers have to remember... that the data is what was of interest here...not them personally. This is where we fail to see the very basics of human nature... no-one cares who you are as a person and it is the last thing they are interested in or concentrate on. When they discuss the results of a personal medical examination of a particular experiencer... no-one cares who the experiencer is... nor are they thinking about her vagina... they are only interested in the data gleaned and possible comparisons. I am against what John did... but fair is fair... lets wipe out half the global UFO field in one shot if we are going to become the inquisition... Or prove ourselves to be better researchers, and gain a far more respected reputation that will bring more trusting experiencers to our doors. Setting out to destroy someone with revenge is almost as bad as betraying a person when it comes to the issue of respect. I certainly would not share my trusted information with anyone who may turn on me at any time. Well that's all I really have to say. Live and let live is a good way to be. I think John is well and truly aware of the problems this has caused and has probably learned a very big lesson from all of this fuss... would you do it again if it were you? There is no need to take it any further in my opinion, as the point has already been made. Maybe what is left to be done is possible discussions between John Carpenter and the abductees involved... some may like an apology. Mike... this will be the only public thing I have to say on this issue. Please add it to your mailists. I realise that there will probably be some nasty responses in reply because of the imaginary political correctness in the UFO field in this country. So bite me I say! Kind regards... Kelly Cahill __________________________ THINK GLOBALLY-ACT LOCALLY! Mike Farrell UFO Researcher & UFO Video Hunter at: http://www.flex.com.au/~eagle1/in8.htm Australia
UFO UpDates - Toronto -
updates@globalserve.net
Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp - ++ 416-696-0304
A Hand-Operated E-Mail Subscription Service for the Study of UFO Related
Phenomena.
To subscribe please send your first and last name to
updates@globalserve.net
Message submissions should be sent to the same address.
|
Link it to the appropriate Ufologist or UFO Topic page. |
Archived as a public service by Area 51 Research Center which is not
responsible for content.
Financial support for this web server is provided by the
Research Center Catalog.
Software by Glenn Campbell.
Technical contact:
webmaster@ufomind.com