From: Egio Hernan De La Vega Buonanno <egiohern@idirect.com> Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2000 14:46:44 -0400 Fwd Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2000 17:59:17 -0400 Subject: UpDate: Re: Jenny Randles' Plea For Sanity - De La Vega >Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2000 23:19:07 +0100 >From: Jenny Randles <nufon@currantbun.com> >Subject: Crop Circles: A Plea For Sanity >To: Updates@sympatico.ca >Crop Circles: A plea for sanity >This week the British media, via several TV reports, national >news, major newspaper articles and ongoing hype have revived the >long flagging field of crop circle research through coverage >that puts this 'mystery' into the context of UFOs and aliens. <snip> You know that I have never sent not even one comment to your List, but I enjoy a lot the diversity of points of view and opinions on the UFO subject and other extranormal phenomena and events that the readers kindly offer to a large attending multitude. In the last few years I have considered and analyzed messages whose authors really were able to show how deeply they had understood the complexity and also simplicity of these phenomena. I have also read other messages whose authors do not hesitate to submerge themselves into the most ridiculous stupidities, abandoning elementary scientific and logical procedures when analyzing those interesting phenomena. I am very surprised and also very sorry to hear from Jenny Randles that she believes the crop circle presence and inherent complexity can be explained away by miserable hoaxes, kind of a gigantic Doug and Dave unprofitable intensive-work enterprise, and the cooperation of normal atmospheric phenomena. To assert with a straight face such an illogical and unscientific statement, absolutely disregarding all available evidence, says a lot about the person and his/her " baggage of knowlege." The size, permanence, frequency and geographic extension of the crop circles would require, from the point of view of organization and personnel, and enormous number of workers, carrying out their job under the control of a secret and invisible and powerful logistical infrastructure, with long international tentacles. It would be something like a Microsoft for crop circles. On top of it, as per Mrs. Randles, part of the circles are produced by " normal atmospheric phenomena", so we must now find a good cause for men and women working very hard together in the lonely fields and in the middle of the night, and in some way being able to keep permanently the cooperation of "plasmas" and "vortices". But that is not all. Now, Her Majesty Queen Mathematics is entering the room, and starts showing us how whoever is working on the grass, not only is a great artesan, but he is capable also of bending the stems so delicately in such a fashion that the greatest mathematical truths, especially the trascendental ones, are being drawn very softly on the meadows. Let's think about it. Not only the images are geometrically perfect, but within the geometric net you find mathematical relationships of extraodinary importance in nuclear and quantum physics. A calm review of the different factors and effects involved in the production of crop circles, lead the investigator (s) to an unavoidable conclusion : the crop circles are produced by technical means and by an intelligence which is independent of the human race. And yes, those who know which are the vincles among mathematics, geometry, logic, and information also must be aware that the crop circles contain a message and a warning. My certainty has a powerful foundation: the high mathematics on the grass can not and are not produced by any human hand. All of you, tourism promoters, trampling the grass with your sloppy boots, ruining the crops, and trying to imitate the girations of the Fibonacci series on the helpless stems, go to Mrs. Randles and complain that you do not have the slightest idea how to walk on the green and make your tracks leave behind a beautiful spiral shouting to everybody the Golden Section. It is not given for the fools to play with mathematics. As simple as that. And where is the simplicity of the whole thing? It would not be irrational at all, on the contrary, quite logical, to propose that the intelligence behind the crop circles might be the same one that uses the ufos as vehicles. How many know that Mr. Ockham had a razor?? Hernan P.S The lightbulb-shaped, buglike-eyed alien, commonly called "Gray" in the U.S. and Canada whose face we can see everywhere, has never been reported by any human witness . Travis Walton described a being white or light gray, large black eyes , features aprox. human. Betty and Barney Hill described gray beings with large black eyes, but still aprox. human features.
UFO UpDates - Toronto -
updates@globalserve.net
Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp - ++ 416-696-0304
A Hand-Operated E-Mail Subscription Service for the Study of UFO Related
Phenomena.
To subscribe please send your first and last name to
updates@globalserve.net
Message submissions should be sent to the same address.
|
Link it to the appropriate Ufologist or UFO Topic page. |
Archived as a public service by Area 51 Research Center which is not
responsible for content.
Financial support for this web server is provided by the
Research Center Catalog.
Software by Glenn Campbell.
Technical contact:
webmaster@ufomind.com