Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here UFOs | Paranormal | Area 51 People | Places | Random Top 100 | What's New Catalog | New Books Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Our Bookstore is OPEN Mothership -> Here

From: Jenny Randles <nufon@currantbun.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2000 00:22:28 +0100
Fwd Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 17:12:05 -0400
Subject: UpDate: Re: Jenny Randles' Plea For Sanity - Randles


 >Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2000 14:46:44 -0400
 >From: Egio Hernan De La Vega Buonanno <egiohern@idirect.com>
 >Subject: Re: Jenny Randles' Plea For Sanity - De La Vega Buonanno
 >To: updates@sympatico.ca

 >>Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2000 23:19:07 +0100
 >>From: Jenny Randles <nufon@currantbun.com>
 >>Subject: Crop Circles: A Plea For Sanity
 >>To: Updates@sympatico.ca

 >You know that I have never sent not even one comment to your
 >List, but I enjoy a lot the diversity of points of view and
 >opinions on the UFO subject and other extranormal phenomena and
 >events that the readers kindly offer to a large attending
 >multitude. In the last few years I have considered and analyzed
 >messages whose authors really were able to show how deeply they
 >had understood the complexity and also simplicity of these
 >phenomena. I have also read other messages whose authors do not
 >hesitate to submerge themselves into the most ridiculous
 >stupidities, abandoning elementary scientific and logical
 >procedures when analyzing those interesting phenomena.

 >I am very surprised and also very sorry to hear from Jenny
 >Randles that she believes the crop circle presence and inherent
 >complexity can be explained away by miserable hoaxes, kind of a
 >gigantic Doug and Dave unprofitable intensive-work enterprise,
 >and the cooperation of normal atmospheric phenomena. To assert
 >with a straight face such an illogical and unscientific
 >statement, absolutely disregarding all available evidence,
 >says a lot about the person and his/her " baggage of knowlege."


Hi,

Just to say that UFOIN will respond to the postings about our
crop circle memo such as the one above.

I simply here wanted to note that  turning what was clearly
issued as a statement by the UFOIN team into my personal plea
(as alleged in the above posting) is misleading.  If it were my
personal plea then I would have issued it onto this list as such
and I clearly did not.

The statement we posted indicated that it was issued by UFOIN (a
team of 20 experienced ufologists - half of whom are highly
published in the field and most of whom are well known to fellow
ufologists). The team includes several pioneer researchers in
the crop circle field.

That is an important difference from this memo being issued as
my personal plea.

Indeed, because it is NOT my plea for sanity, but UFOINs,I have
to collate responses from the rest of the team rather than
simply issue my personal reaction here.

But I will post responses - and they will be comments by the
team. So please bear with me - and do appreciate that my name is
there on the memo only because I posted it onto this list...

Although I should emphasise that I do, as it happens, personally
support the memo that we issued.

Best wishes,

Jenny Randles