Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here UFOs | Paranormal | Area 51 People | Places | Random Top 100 | What's New Catalog | New Books Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Our Bookstore is OPEN Mothership -> Here

From: Jan Aldrich <jan@cyberzone.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 11:45:24 -0400
Fwd Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 15:17:05 -0400
Subject: UpDate: Corso, SDI, MJ-12 And All That...


If you turn to page 273 in The Book, the Savior speaks: "In
fact, the U. S. military has better, more accurate, and more
powerful weapons for killing UFOs than were deployed in the
movie "Independence Day."

"We can knock these guys down tomorrow with high-energy lasers
and directed particle=beam weapons that come right out of a
"Star Wars" movie. And these aren't fiction, they're fact. If
you want to know move, pay a visit to the U. S. Army Space
Command Website on the Internet. The missile-launched HELs ar
the pride of our planetary defense system and a direct result of
President Reagan's courage in pushing for the Strategic Defense
Initiative when everyone said it wouldn't work. And that SDI was
a direct result of the work General Trudeau and I did at Army
R&D in 1962.

"Sometimes things just work the way they're supposed to.
Sometimes, once in a very long while, you get the chance to save
your country, your planet, and even your species at the same
time....."

We know this is true because many people here say that Corso was
an honorable man. A man who would not lie. Just one question
then, what was that little exercise the other day to try to
shoot down another missile? Why should we need that at all, if
Corso's claims are true? If we can shoot down ET at will, a
simple ballistic missile ( i. e. an object stuck in the gravity
well with no great evasion capability) is child's play. A
$100,000,000 test failure is just a cover up for the Phil
Corso's defense system? Yes, of course, I'll say it first, so no
one has to post it.

Like Tarzan swing through the jungle on vines, some in the UFO
field swings from one set of weirdness to another. Now comes
MJ-12 back again. It is interesting that posters have done
little independent digging, except it seem for Greg. Nice work
Greg!

The MJ-12 seems to be modeled after material from General George
Marshall's papers. In fact, one MJ-12 document from the first
set had an altered letter from Marshall to Republican
presidential candidate Dewey concerning the Japanese "Magic"
code intercepts in 1944. The dates and and names had been
changed and the word Majic substituted for the word Magic. You
won't find any mention of this in the Woods' work.

Actually, the Woods go out of their way *not* to detect any
problems with the MJ-12 documents. As previously mentioned, the
style of the Marshall letters and messages are incorporated into
the MJ-12 documents. Although military Top Secret documents from
the 1947 era had Top Secret control numbers, TS documents during
World War II did not. One can view various TS documents with the
control numbers at the Project 1947 website:

http://www.project1947.com/

This is the first hint. Cooper's first set of documents do not.
I expect any new documents from Cooper on MJ-12 will incorporate
them now. If you will notice, some documents in Cooper's first
set are addressed to the Director of Naval Intelligence. During
WW II, it was indeed the Director of Naval Intelligence.
However, about October 1945 the title changed to Chief of Naval
Intelligence. So the Cooper 1947 documents are wrong. Director
of Naval Intelligence again became the title about 1948. Two
years of research on the Wood's part did not detect this. Second
hint.

"Eyes Only." Marshall had summaries of the most important Magic
intercepts distributed daily to various US officials, President,
Adm Leahy, etc. He had a list and only those officials were
allowed to see the papers. Additional many were mark "Eyes
Only." This is not a security classification, however. As many
of Marshall's message to Devers, Eisenhower, etc were marked Top
Secret, "Eyes only General Devers." Marshall and General Hap
Arnold exchanged letters about Arnold's health situation in
which Arnold would mark the letters for Marshall "secret (eyes
only)."

Where did the word "Majestic" come from? Well, I am not going to
tell, do your own research. It is more satisfying that way.

Now we have the Eisenhower Briefing document which has one
scenario and the Cooper MJ-12 documents that have another.  Both
can't be right. Most haven't noticed the contradictions. Stan
Friedman and the Woods will be at the MUFON conference; so one
would expect sparks to fly, but in keeping with "not being
negative" no contradictions will be mentioned. I don't think we
will hear any comments at all about these two different
scenarios.  Friedman and the Woods have indeed taken swipes at
each other. Friedman mentioned that some of Cooper's documents
were "parodies." of other documents.

The one thing the Woods have done, is brought to light that SOM
1-01 came from Kirtland AFB.  What honest, upstanding, honorable
military man associated with Bill Moore also came from Kirtland?

Now someone recently posted a number of characteristics of MJ-12
that his informant told him about. He missed one. Incredibly
stupid! As pointed out before, SOM 1-01, is completely silent
about overhead cover to prevent observation of any UFO recovery
from the air or from higher ground. Has no one heard of
camouflage nets?  Something a pilot or any Army guy would be
familiar with: the necessity of overhead cover.  But an OSI type
who has probably never seen a field exercise?  If you were never
close to a field exercise you wouldn't think of that. Of course,
may be MJ-12 is incredibly stupid. They do leave manuals and
paperwork where it can easily be copied and transferred to
Cooper's mail box.

One ufologist told me he was relectant to write an expose of the
Cooper papers as it would just tell the hoaxers how to do it
better the next time. A valid concern, I believe. Actually,
looking at the latest crop of MJ-12 stuff, it is less convincing
than the former. However, I do believe that subsequent material
found in Cooper's mail box or more likely sent directly to the
Woods will be much better and will no longer reflect the sytle
of doucments found in the Marshall Papers. Since Cooper has a
wide range of FOIAs in right now, on diverse subjects, I expect
that the new MJ-12 documents will reveal a number of changes in
style and content.

The main things about the MJ-12 documents, we don't know where
they came from, and we can't find any link in the real world.

Jan Aldrich