Aliens On Earth.com Resources for those who are stranded here Our Bookstore is OPEN Over 5000 new & used titles, competitively priced! Topics: UFOs - Paranormal - Area 51 - Ghosts - Forteana - Conspiracy - History - Biography - Psychology - Religion - Crime - Health - Geography - Maps - Science - Money - Language - Recreation - Technology - Fiction - Other - New Search... for keyword(s)   in Page Titles in Book Title/Author in Contents of Pages ---other searches--- Metacrawler Yahoo FAST Search Google Altavista Dogpile Inference Find Northern Light IWon.com MSN Search Las Vegas Sun Location: Mothership -> UFO -> Updates -> 2000 -> Mar -> Re: Reed Hoax

UFO UpDates Mailing List

From: Robert Gates <RGates8254@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2000 03:04:16 -0500 (EST)
Fwd Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2000 07:18:24 -0500
Subject: Re: Reed Hoax


 >Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2000 04:13:42 -0800
 >From: Royce J. Myers III <ufowatchdog@earthlink.net>
 >Subject: Reed Hoax
 >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@sympatico.ca>

 >As many of you know, Jonathan Reed and his partner Robert Raith
 >are at the International UFO Congress conference in Nevada
 >trying to sell their scam to the public.


Royce,

Since people seem to think that a person whose credentials and
basic back ground information doesn't check out, or can't be
verified should be listened and paid attention to, I would like
to make a proposal.

I propose the following list of speakers for the next
conference... after all they would dovetail nicely into some of
the audience's speaking tastes.

First guy on the list would be the dude from up North who was
claiming that he was part of the NASA shuttle program and even
supplied NASA phone numbers.  He unloaded story after story
about various insider revelations, even putting up his own web
site with his tales and storys.

Naturally, everybody knows that when anything is posted on a web
site, its an absolute truth, never to be doubted. The dude was
investigated and found out to be a phony, AND admitted (when
confronted) that everything he said was not true.  He would
probably be high up on some peoples idea of the perfect
conference speaker.

We should invite the purported NASA engineer who was unloading
tales and storys about how supposed space scientist insiders
were telling him about how they were receiving ET signals, how
on Jan 24th 1997, the earth would get blanketed with ET signals
which would begin a new day for humanity.  Even though none of
the information turned out to be true, he would be a top
candidate for the speaking/conference tour.

I recall the one guy (Noodle?) who was claiming various mass
landing dates during the same time period.  Even though none of
his claims ever came true, he would be another top candidate.

Then we had all the people who were unloading the
Yellowbook/Redbook/ Christ is an ET tale, mixed with the claim
that on April 24th 1997, mass ET landings would happen in the
desert SW.  None of this happened and the information turned out
to be bogus, BUT wouldn't these people be interesting speakers
at the conference?

We could invite the people wagging tales and storys about how
the Republicans and Democrats were going to make the ET/UFOs are
real disclosure during the 1996 Presidential election.  Never
happened but gee, these same people who like Reed, would
probably find these people even better yet.

We could invite all the authors and writers who interpret
Nostradamus. They were the ones who claimed last year that
during the 9th month of 1999 the great terror would come from
the sky.  These same theorists looked up and used every calender
known to man (which included one that the 9th month of 1999
ended on Oct 10th) and it never showed up. Never mind that these
people were wrong.  It just makes them more appealing to some
people.

We could mix a little religion theorists into the pot.  You
know, the ones who were claiming that Armageddon would happen no
later then 1975, then 1979, then the early 80s, then 1989, then
1994, then 1999, and now 2000 and beyond.  Hey, just because
they were wrong doesn't mean that we shouldn't eagerly listen to
every word out of their mouth.  :)

Lastly we could invite some of Richard Hoaglands intelligence
community sources who were unloading tales and storys about an
ET landing to happen on a mountain top last December.  Even
though it never happened, they would probably be enthralling
speakers to some people.  While we were inviting them, we could
invite Hoaglands NASA sources who were claiming that when the
MARS rover (buggy, or whatever the thing was) was actually going
to land on July 21st, not in early July when it in fact did.   I
am sure they could unload an even more enthralling tale then we
have previously heard.

Gee, why should we even bother with speakers whose credentials
can be checked out such as Stan Friedman, Kevin Randle, Jerry
Clark and the many others?  We could fill up every conference
with fictional story tellers and tale bearers feeding us tales
and storys that tickle our ears.

Some people say that this and other conferences are all about
entertainment.  Who knows, they may be right.

cheers,

Robert