From: Gufon@ix.netcom.com (Gene Huff)
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy.area51
Subject: Gene Huff re: "Lazar As A  Fictional Character"
Date: 30 Mar 1995 02:01:32 GMT

 I've just read Glenn Campbell's 1994 article entitled "Lazar As A 
Fictional Character". I'm not sure why that is the title unless Lazar's 
name enticed more people to read it. It certainly enticed me. It's a 
great article and Glenn is certainly a good writer. However, I thought 
I'd clarify a couple of things for those less familiar with the story. 

 Our sightings in 1989 took place about 5 miles in on Groom Lake Road 
and subsequently the "Mail Box Road" is the one that became popular. I 
don't know why this happened, but we had nothing to do with it.

 Glenn mentions that Bob Lazar's "long association with ufologist John 
Lear" creates doubt about Lazar's story. He proceeds to say "Lazar 
thought Lear was looney tunes back then, but later changed his mind".  
I've got news for everyone, Lazar never changed his mind. Anyone who 
read the synopsis I posted a few weeks ago knows that our getting busted 
while disc viewing outside of area 51 was not the reason for Bob's 
departure from the program, which is what Glenn later asserts.  

 If you believe Lear's claims about Bob then you must also believe these 
other claims for which Lear is renowned:

 There is a roof over area 51 and the jets that fly in there have to 
land under it.

 We're being eaten by Aliens.

 There are 2 billion grey aliens living in the mountains along the 
highway that leads from Las Vegas up to Groom Lake.

Need I go on? Many of you could probably expand this list further than I 
could. My point is that Lear's unbelievable claims about Bob are just 
that.

 Lastly, Glenn referred to the story about Bob reading that human beings 
are "containers", and posed the question, "Are we containers of souls?".
For the record, that reference was in the section of the reports that 
also stated that we are products of "externally corrected evolution" and 
that man as a species has been genetically altered 65 times. Bob and I 
think, and have always thought, that the reports were referring to the 
fact that we have the right genetic make-up to be employed in 
accelerated evolution. For instance, you could genetically alter a shark 
a multitude of times and he could never build a skyscraper.

 Glenn wasn't aware of some of this back then, and the article is still 
great reading and insightful. I highly recommend it.

                                     Gene Huff