From: gufon@ix.netcom.com (Gene Huff) Newsgroups: alt.paranet.ufo,alt.conspiracy.area51,alt.alien.visitors Subject: Lazar/SBIRP 1 Date: 21 Jul 1995 15:24:26 GMT Organization: Netcom Message-ID: <3uogra$rgu@ixnews6.ix.netcom.com> You may want to take a look at a previous post called "Back Engineering Discs - right under our noses?" so the following will make sense to you. When ex-U.S. government scientist Bob Lazar went public in 1989, he asserted that the gravity propelled disc he helped back engineer had a power source which which was an "anti- matter reactor", a device unknown to earth science. Would the U.S. government work toward reproducing something like that right in public view? Let's take a look at this solicitation from the Department of Defense Small Business Innovative Research book from 1989. This particular solicitation is from the "Space Division, Los Angeles Air Force Station, California". AF89-192. TITLE: Technology for Storage, Handling, or Use of Antimatter OBJECTIVE: Develop technology in the area of : 1) analysis of matter-anti-matter annihilation radiation; 2) prediction of its products and effects; or 3) safe long-term, hight density storage systems for antimatter. DESCRIPTION: Antimatter is composed of quantum mechanical particles which have reverse properties of their normal matter counterparts. When antimatter and matter are allowed to interact, the entire mass of both is converted into energetic radiation, mostly charged pion and gamma rays in the near field. The property of animatter has led to concepts for the use of stored antimatter as an analytic radiation source in the near term, and as an energy source for rocket propellant in the far term. Proposals are sought to design and demonstrate an element of the technology needed to use antimatter which: 1) can be developed within the funding and time limitations of an SBIR procurement, and 2) can be demonstrated using an appropriate form of normal matter (a normal matter analog) to simulate antimatter. For instance, solid hydrogen could be used as a normal matter analog of solid antihydrogen in a magnetic suspension system. Examples of the technologies sought include: wide angle, high resolution X-ray fluorescence, annihilation gamma ray, or charged pion detector arrays to locate and characterize annihilation sites within normal matter; storage systems for charged or neutral solid antihydrogen;computer models and software for predicting annihilation products and their effects; and other innovative technologies. Thie first phase of this effort shall consist of a design for the proposed technology element. In Phase II the selected item shall be built and demonstrated with a normal matter analog. Designs shall consider (as applicable): radiological safety with respect to annihilation rates; vacuum requirements; temperature requirements (solid antihydrogen storage will probably require a 1 deg Kelvin radiative hear sink); proposed uses of the technology and other appropriate constraints. Well, what do you think? Could the U.S. governement be working toward an anti-matter reactor and could this solicitation be connected with the effort at S4? See Lazar/SBIRP 2, and we'll continue. Gene Huff ---------- From: gufon@ix.netcom.com (Gene Huff) Newsgroups: alt.paranet.ufo,alt.conspiracy.area51,alt.alien.visitors Subject: Lazar/SBIRP 2 Date: 21 Jul 1995 15:46:50 GMT Organization: Netcom Message-ID: <3uoi5a$rt5@ixnews6.ix.netcom.com> You may want to read a previous post called, "Back Engineering Discs - right under our noses?" for this to make sense to you. In 1989, ex-U.S. government scientist Bob Lazar stated that the discs he helped back engineer had allegedly been brought here by ETs from the Zeta Reticuli 2 star system. He also said that one of the main reasons the government won't reveal the info on the discs is that they want to perfect the technology for defense purposes. Is it possible that the U.S. Department of Defense could actually have alien technology or that they take any of this UFO related activity as an actual threat to the security of the U.S.? Let's take a look at this solicitation from the Department of Defense Small Business Innovative Research Program book from 1989. This particular solicitation is also from the "Space Division, Los Angeles Air Force Station, California". AF89-176. TITLE: Innovative Concepts for Improved Space Object Surveillance and Classification. OBJECTIVE: To develop new technologies and innovative applications of existing technologies to improve space object surveillance and classification. DESCRIPTION: New technologies and innovative applications of existing technologies need to be investigated to improve space object surveillance and classification. Classification should include a determination of the mission and potential hostile intent of space objects. Topics of particular interest include, but are not limited to : optical design for high off-axis rejection of visible light in centered telescopes for space object surveillance; decontamination of optics on space sensors for visible light applications; sun and earth shades on space sensors for visible light applications; nuclear event detection; improved resolution and cloud penetration techniques for ground based systems; and radar and laser techniques for classification of space based systems. Phase I will define the concepts and establish the technology and methodology requirements to validate the concept. The contractor shall provide a rough estimate of anticipated improvements over the existing systems, as well as projected cost savings. Phase II will develop a laboratory model, validate the technology and demonstrate in the laboratory the concepts proposed in phase I. Well, what do you think? Are satellites the only worry of the U.S. DOD, or does this run a little deeper and could it be related to the ET discs at S4 in central Nevada? See Lazar/SBIRP 3, and we'll conclude. --------------- spiracies You may want to take a look at a previous post called, "Back Engineering Discs - right under our noses?" so the following will make sense to you. In 1989, ex-U.S. government scientist Bob Lazar asserted that the gravity propelled discs he helped back engineer used space/time distortion and an amplified gravity wave to enable them to traverse vast distances almost instantaneously. He also said that some of these ET discs were currently being test flown by human pilots. Under these circumstances, communications could be a problem. Could the U.S. government be overtly working on communications systems to enable them to adequately communicate with the pilots of these crafts, while they fly right here in our atmosphere? Let's take a look at this solicitation from the Department of Defense Small Business Innovative Research book from 1989. This particular solicitation is from the "National Aero-Space Plane Joint Office, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio." AF89-254 TITLE: Global Communication Strategies for Hypersonic Vehicles OBJECTIVE: Improved test control strategies and centers for hypersonic flight tests. DESCRIPTION: Testing hypervelocity (Mach 25) vehicles provide a new problem to traditional aircraft test ranges. The higher speed vehicles no longer remain within the confines of the range, or even the country, but still require continuous communications and telemetry. Phase I studies must describe available systems and those planned to be operational by May 1995. The studies should show how the appropriate sysstems could be integrated to form a single point test control center. Phase 2 should form a demonstration single point test control center and exercise the world-wide telemetry and communications. Ever heard of Wright-Patterson AFB before? Seen anything flying at Mach 25 lately? Could this type of communication program be connected to the disc program at S4 in central Nevada? I'm going to sum this up here. There are other entries in the 1989 SBIRP book which could also be related like "Thermionic Energy Conversion Technology", which is described as "Develop key technologies for compact, survivable thermionic nuclear power suppplies in the 5-25 kW range". However, since the power requirements are too low to be connected with the discs as Lazar described them, I didn't include that or other similiarly related topics here. However, the power requirements may be that low to set some achievable goals and start from there as everybody had to start somewhere, I don't know. The 1989 SBIRP book is loaded with other scientific/technological solicitations which could be connected to the disc program in central Nevada, however, many of the solicitations are for complex technology and I don't even know what they're talking about. Someone with a broader scientific and technological knowledge base than me could probably find numerous potential connections. Anyway, I think we'll hear a lot of varying explanations of these solicitations, and I don't doubt that there could be logical non-ET disc related reasons for these scientific/technological problems. However, collectively these types of solicitations paint an R&D picture that doesn't seem to make Bob Lazar's claims so outrageous, as many have stated. It's apparent that the U.S. government could be doing S4 related R&D overtly with a complete look of innocence. All they have to do is properly compartmentalize and they could do it right if front of our faces. Sometimes we're so busy scrutinizing other things, we fail to correlate the obvious. Either way, the SBIRP books are a great way to get insight into some of the current technological/scientific dilemmas of varying agencies of the U.S. DOD. The excerpts you've read were from 1989, 6 & 1/2 years ago, and who knows what type of insight the current SBIRP books could give us. In fact, I don't even know if the Small Business Innovative Research Program still exists or if it's been discontinued due to federal cutbacks. So, what do you think? Gene Huff