Subj:   Re: Alien Autopsy Comments
Date:   Wed, Sep 6, 1995 10:44 PM PDT
From:  kuryakin@arn.net

>From "DAVE"
+
+I just wanted to add my two cents to this discussion.

And I want to comment on a couple of things...

In the autopsy footage... when they got to the eye... in spite of the fact
that they'd made a great deal of pulling all kinds of stuff out of the
body...
all they did was remove the nictus membrane off the eyeball.

Eh?

First... they didn't remove the eyeball, they went straight for the membrane.

That membrane wasn't attached to anything... it was merely a film that
covered the eyeball.  More like a contact lens (sunglasses?  Data screen
for some cyberpunkish computer system?) than a true nictus membrane.  The
cat's 'second eyelid' can open and close.  This one wouldn't do that.  They
peeled it off like the skin on an onion.

Other observations:

Second... if I was handing out Special Access clearances to technical
specialty types... you can make damn sure that I'm going to get someone who
knows how to focus the damn camera.  Someone in that position isn't going
to be a flunky gopher they hand a camera to and say 'Here, go shoot this
alien autopsy'.  The photographer will be a professional-calibre
photographer.

Third... the doctors would be military or DOD civilians.  Have to be.  In
spite of the arrogant nature of Doctors in general towards the hired help,
they would have been 'aware' of the need to document and would have stepped
aside from time to time for closeups... particularly of the brain.

Fourth... why was the third person _behind the glass_ wearing a mask?

Fifth... why did we not see the right wall?

+pc. process.  The fact that I am not seeing a join between the head and the
+body and no seams running down the arm or the head tells me several things:
+  a. This is a real artifact-or-
+  b. This is a very expensive prop.
+  c. Or just the gods of film and video helping out our
+     work.  Film hides a multitude of sins and video
+     hides even more.
+

I'm inclined (because of the above (some of which I'll credit to unnamed others)
to believe it's fake, as much as I'd like to believe otherwise.

Now, you say 'But it's hideously expensive to make'.

Sure it is.  That leads you to consider two possibilities of who did this...
IE Who has the money and the motive.

One:  Some well-off UFO buff that wants something that might prod the
general populace into pestering the government into releasing the 'true
story'.
(I'm inclined to believe that Roswell did indeed occur).

Two:  The government... for disinformation purposes.  Think of the impact
it will have if/when it's proven to be a fake.

My $1.50 worth...

Rick

Rick Pavek                                   |  Hate OZ.  Took the Shoes.
kuryakin@arn.net                             |  Find your own way home.
Graphics and HTML for hire                   |____________________Toto
http://northshore.shore.net/~wxcentrl/uncle/index.html