|
The problem of UFO luminosity is an important one. Of all of the features of
the UFO pattern, UFO emissions of visible light are among the most notable and
characteristic. An analysis of photographs can reveal important features of
UFO luminosity, given that the photos are authentic.
In addition, there appears to be a close correlation between luminosity and
behavior. The luminosity brightens, dims, changes color, and flashes, often
showing a direct relationship to behavior.
Are They "Lights"? - Types Of Luminosity And Their Characteristics[1]
-
There are several categories of UFO luminosity: a) Full body, b) Patchy
body, c) Rim lighting, d) Point sources, e) Beams, f) Ejected.
-
Full body luminosity is usually observed on objects in flight. In rare
cases it is observed in a landed or hovering UFO, however, in those cases,
the object usually almost immediately engages in flight. Occupants are (I
believe) never observed near UFOs in the full body state (in fact, landed
UFOs rarely emit luminosity, except in a few cases where emissions from
the base of the UFO are seen to continue as the UFO hovers). In some cases,
the full body luminosity flashes on and off in a way frequently compared
to a flourescent light startup (this was reported at Levelland,
1:15 AM). The Selma, AL case of 10/29/57
represents a good example of full body luminosity with variations. Further
the Levelland case may indicate some relationship between full body luminosity
and vehicle interference effects (the witness observed the intensity of
his headlights varied inversely with the brightness of the UFO luminosity,
this may have been a brightness effect or may have been an actual response
to the cause of the luminosity variations).
-
Patchy body light is usually observed on slow flying or hovering objects.
Sometimes this is exhibited as a full body covering which displays different
colors on different portions of the object's geometry (i.e. a dome which
differs in color from the body of the object. Other times, as in the Tulsa,
OK photo, there are areas of darkness between the lighting patches,
and the patches can be seen to be fairly well delimited.
-
Rim lighting can be part of a patchy body light or can be the only lighting
displayed by an object. This is sometimes perceived as "portholes" and sometimes
as a solid band. It has also been seen to flash in sequence and in unison.
Sometimes the rim lighting is seen to provide the illusion of rotation.
As shown in the Moreland case, it
seems this is distinct from the sequential flashing of the sort observed
in the Exeter case, and actually represents
some form of movement around the rim of distinct plasma sources. The Moreland
case, among others, also suggests that as with the previous two categories,
these "lights" are actually some sort of plasma, probably a cold plasma,
and, further, that the generation of this plasma is distinct from that produced
by combustion, in that insufficient turbulence exists at the boundary layer
to produce the typical loud noise that such "flames" would be expected to
generate.
-
To the best of my knowledge, there are few close observations of point
source lighting. If the Villas Boas case is to be believed, his observation
indicates that these are bright areas of the surface of the object rather
than incandescent lights as we know them. Further, assuming the validity
of the Petit-Rechain photo from Belgium,
we can see that the tips of a triangular UFO show lights which may also
be attributable to a plasma phenomenon. In that photo, one can observe interesting
striations of density in the light, and wisps which appear to be partly
detached from the source. The example of what the Moreland case revealed
about the rim lighting of UFOs makes me cautiously willing to consider that
point sources are, like the rest of UFO lighting, plasma manifestations
of some energetic phenomenon near the surface of the UFO.
-
Beams appear to fall into two classes - normal and slow. Normal light beams
behave like searchlights or lasers, and are likely to be just such phenomena
(though one may note that a laser can be produced from a plasma, and it
is possible that UFOs simply control their plasmas in such a way as to cause
lasing of various sorts). Slow beams, as observed at Trancas,
Argentina, seem, on the other hand, in view of their slow propagation,
to certainly be some sort of plasma phenomenon.
- Ejected luminosity, as shown in the Robert
Campbell photos from August 2, 1965, is sometimes reported. Material remains
luminous for some time after falling away from the object. If this material
is a plasma then a) it is heavier than air, and b) it is cohesive enough to
survive a fall through the air and retain its luminosity. It seems more likely
that this is a luminous or molten liquid.
Now, in looking at the various cases, one can come to some tentative conclusions:
-
Most photos of luminosity show some form of limb darkening, strengthening
the idea that UFO luminosity is a plasma. (See, for instance, the Tulsa,
OK photo).
-
UFOs must input energy into the near surface area to generate an atmospheric-ionization
style luminosity. This energy does not appear to be heat energy (since UFOs
emit relatively low levels of heat in close encounters), and thus is more
likely to be the result of the injection of electrons (or other particles),
UV light, x-rays, or gamma rays into the near surface area. Because of the
difficultly of creating plasmas at atmospheric density and temperature,
it is also possible (especially in light of the luminosity of some reported
submarine UFOs that UFOs create an
area of lower atmospheric density near their surface.
-
UFOs could maintain the near surface area ionization by emitting energy
into the near surface area across the entire surface of the object, or from
localized areas (the rim being a likely suspect for disc shaped UFOs, the
points for spindle shaped or elliptical UFOs). Further, it is possible that
maintaining this ionization even when not in the full body state would make
it easier to go to the full body state.
-
The maintenance of this ionization might also benefit from the injection
of ionized atoms or molecules into the sheath, much as a gas laser sometimes
requires replacement or refreshing of its contents. This may explain the
occasional chemical odors and the occasional presence of apparently
chemical-related burns and rashes in close encounter cases. On the other
hand, these odors and substances may be a by-product of the dissipation
of energy injected into the sheath (for instance, could formaldehyde, a
frequently reported smell, be produced by chemical reactions in an atmospheric
plasma without the injection of potential reactors into the sheath?).
-
Given these ideas, it is possible that the point source lighting may well
represent the localized injection of energy or energetic atoms / molecules
into critical locations of the sheath area when the UFO is in the non-full
body state. Some cases suggest these even may be visible in the full body
state when the full body emission wavelengths are sufficiently different
from those near these localized sources. On the other hand, they may also
represent random or sporadic lasing of specific areas of the sheath under
certain conditions of energy emission or local plasma state. I am skeptical
that these represent lighting in the sense of our aircraft lighting. I am
further skeptical that most if not all of the luminosity represents a by
product of a propulsion system, since UFOs clearly can fly while in the
completely darkened state. Thus, I suspect, that these are manifestations
of an air sheath for ensuring laminar flow over the UFO body at high speeds.
One other interesting point - a few UFO photos show small
detached points and elongated spikes of luminosity. It is possible that
these represent the reaction of moisture with the electrical and magnetic field
of the sheath.
I also consider it possible that UFO luminosity represents a laser-type phenomenon,
in the sense that an energy population inversion might be necessary to allow
UFO luminosity to propagate from the base to the edge of the sheath. I am currently
attempting to find some mathematical tools which will allow me to calculate
some related information:
The amount of energy needed to create a luminous plasma at various densities
and pressures from atmospheric gases.
What controls the ability of photons to make it from the inside of the plasma
to the outside and how can we interpret limb darkening in an attempt to derive
the density of the UFO sheath.
Comments and suggestions are welcomed by the author.
Detailed Studies
Non-Photographic Cases With Special Luminosity Observations
| 4/21/57 |
Mrs. Gilberte Ausserre and Mrs. Rolande Prevost, Montlucon,
France, 1:45 AM |
Hemisphere with luminous skirt |
8/7/98 |
| 10/29/57 |
USAF Captain, Selma, AL; 10:30PM |
Apparently large luminous ellipse demonstrated periodic
changes in luminosity and affected lights and radio |
10/24/97 |
| 7/13/59 |
Mrs. Frederick Moreland, Blenheim, NZ, 5:30 AM |
Swollen hands and brown patches on face beginning a
few days after close encounter with a disk with transparent dome (2 occupants)
and rotating orange-green rim jets |
4/24/97
update 5/20/97 |
| 7/20/64 |
Anonymous Government Clerk, Illinois State Route 101,
Illinois, 4:45 AM |
Object shows a variety of luminous configurations |
8/7/98 |
| 7/20/67 |
Captain Ardanza and crew, Naviero, 120 mi off
Cape Santa Maria Grande, Brazil; 6:15 PM |
Sighting of submerged luminous object without a wake
(demonstrates luminosity occurs even underwater) |
8/4/97 |
| 10/28/75 |
Sgt. Eichner et.al. Loring AFB, Maine 7:45PM |
Many witnesses observed a luminous object scouting a
nuclear weapons storage facility. The object was tracked on radar; unusual
luminosity |
7/13/97 |
Footnotes
1. Thanks to Kevan Farmer for putting the question
which prompted this summary. Thanks to John Sheldon for asking questions which
caused a major revision and elaboration of this material.
|
|